[2021] KEHC 608 (KLR)
The court held that it has no jurisdiction to entertain claims arising under the Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA), as previously determined in a reasoned judgment by Hon. Mr. Justice Musyoka. The applications for stay, brought by the appellant, disregarded these prior decisions and were therefore dismissed. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 608 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: West Kenya Sugar Co. Limited; Respondent: Matayo Ingoshe
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 56 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay
- Outcome
- applications dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Workplace Injury, Wiba Jurisdiction, High Court Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
West Kenya Sugar Co. Limited
Appellant
Matayo Ingoshe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine claims arising under the Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA).
- 2 Whether the applications for stay should be granted in light of previous decisions on jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that it has no jurisdiction to entertain claims arising under the Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA), as previously determined in a reasoned judgment by Hon. Mr. Justice Musyoka. The applications for stay, brought by the appellant, disregarded these prior decisions and were therefore dismissed. The court emphasized that the continued filing of such applications, in the face of clear judicial pronouncements on lack of jurisdiction, was improper and bordered on contempt. Accordingly, the applications were dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
applications dismissed with costs
Orders
- The applications for stay are dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2018
WEST KENYA SUGAR CO. LIMITED......................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
MATAYO INGOSHE...................................................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G AND O R D E R
1. This is one of a series of suits regarding the same accident/incident. It is in respect of claims for an injury at work. In short it is a WIBA claim. It is settled law that the High Court has no jurisdiction to deal with WIBA claims. The approach taken has been either to transfer an appeal or dismiss it. Each Judge has made a decision based on the facts before him/her.
2. In this case and the other associated cases, Hon. Mr. Justice Musyoka did not summarily dismiss the cases. Instead he went to the trouble of delivering a reasoned judgment explaining why he had no jurisdiction.
3. It is clear from the several applications – seeking a stay that the Applicant and/or its Legal Advisors have not paid an iota of attention to those decisions.
4. These Applications fly in the face of that decision in a way that borders on contempt.
5. In the circumstances this Court has no option but to dismiss the applications with costs.
Order accordingly,
Farah S. M. Amin
JUDGE
SIGNED, AND DELIVERED IN KAKAMEGA THIS THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021.
In the Presence of
Court Assistant: Wasilwa
Appellant: Ms. Lukasile for Appellant on line using the teams platform
Respondent: Mr. Abok for the Respondents on line using the teams platform