Wil Developers & Construction Ltd & another v Agrofarm Products Ltd & 9 others (Civil Suit E355 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 6025 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (30 April 2026) (Ruling)
The consent order dated 15th May 2024 superseded and set aside the default judgment to the extent of the matters addressed therein. The parties are bound to proceed strictly in accordance with the consent, and the issues of interest and costs must be determined as per the consent order. Execution based on the default judgment for interest and costs is legally untenable.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 6025 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: WIL Developers & Construction Ltd; Plaintiff: Johnson Mwanzia Wambua; Defendant: Agrofarm Products Ltd; Defendant: Kamoma Ventures Ltd; Defendant: Boniface Kamau Macharia; Defendant: Clifford Okoth Ongungo; Defendant: Cliff Moseti Obwogi; Defendant: Allan Kiprotich Chesang’; Defendant: Esther Kalungu Ngotho; Defendant: David Kahi Ambuku; Defendant: Elysha Onyango Oswago; Defendant: Agro International Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2026
- Case Number
- Civil Suit E355 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment and Stay Execution
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Consent Orders, Stay of Execution, Costs and Interest, Setting Aside Judgment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WIL Developers & Construction Ltd
Plaintiff
Johnson Mwanzia Wambua
Plaintiff
Agrofarm Products Ltd
Defendant
Kamoma Ventures Ltd
Defendant
Boniface Kamau Macharia
Defendant
Clifford Okoth Ongungo
Defendant
Cliff Moseti Obwogi
Defendant
Allan Kiprotich Chesang’
Defendant
Esther Kalungu Ngotho
Defendant
David Kahi Ambuku
Defendant
Elysha Onyango Oswago
Defendant
Agro International Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment and Stay Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent order superseded the default judgment
- 2 Whether the default judgment should be set aside
- 3 Whether stay of execution should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The consent order dated 15th May 2024 superseded and set aside the default judgment to the extent of the matters addressed therein. The parties are bound to proceed strictly in accordance with the consent, and the issues of interest and costs must be determined as per the consent order. Execution based on the default judgment for interest and costs is legally untenable.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Stay of execution of the default judgment dated 28th April 2023 and the decree arising therefrom is granted.
- The default judgment is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment