[2018] KEELRC 501 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 501 (KLR)

The Court found that there was no affidavit of service or other evidence on record to demonstrate that the Respondent had been served with a hearing notice for the proceedings of 18 October 2018. The only notice on record was an invitation to fix a hearing date, not a notice of the hearing itself. Given the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 501 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Wilberforce Andrew Olando; Respondent: Japa Protection Systems Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1531 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Setting Aside Proceedings
Outcome
Proceedings of 18 October 2018 set aside; matter to be fixed for fresh hearing upon proper service.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Right to Be Heard, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Right to Be Heard Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilberforce Andrew Olando

Claimant

Japa Protection Systems Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Setting Aside Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent was properly served with a hearing notice for the proceedings of 18 October 2018.
  2. 2 Whether failure to serve the Respondent with a hearing notice vitiated the proceedings and orders made on 18 October 2018.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that there was no affidavit of service or other evidence on record to demonstrate that the Respondent had been served with a hearing notice for the proceedings of 18 October 2018. The only notice on record was an invitation to fix a hearing date, not a notice of the hearing itself. Given the fundamental importance of the right to be heard, the Court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to set aside the proceedings of 18 October 2018 and directed that the Claimant should fix a fresh hearing date, ensuring proper service on the Respondent.

Court Disposition

Proceedings of 18 October 2018 set aside; matter to be fixed for fresh hearing upon proper service.

Orders

  • The proceedings of 18 October 2018 are set aside.
  • The Claimant is to cause a fresh hearing date to be fixed by the registry.