[2018] KEHC 3633 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 3633 (KLR)

The court determined that the substance of the petition relates to employment and recruitment, matters which are expressly reserved for the Employment and Labour Relations Court under Article 162(2) of the Constitution. Article 165(5)(b) specifically excludes the High Court from exercising jurisdiction over such...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 3633 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Wilfred Murithi Kirima; Applicant: Douglas Mbae Kiogora; Applicant: Christopher Mwiti; Applicant: Patrick Kirigia; Applicant: Martin Mwenda; Applicant: Francis Curukia; Applicant: Adam Yassin; Respondent: Meru County Public Service Board
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 22 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Jurisdiction
Outcome
Preliminary objection upheld; High Court lacks jurisdiction; file to be transferred to Employment and Labour Relations Court.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of High Court, Employment Recruitment Disputes, Constitutional Violation Claims
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Employment and Labour Jurisdiction of High Court Employment Recruitment Disputes Constitutional Violation Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilfred Murithi Kirima

Applicant

Douglas Mbae Kiogora

Applicant

Christopher Mwiti

Applicant

Patrick Kirigia

Applicant

Martin Mwenda

Applicant

Francis Curukia

Applicant

Adam Yassin

Applicant

Meru County Public Service Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to employment and recruitment by a County Public Service Board.
  2. 2 Whether the petition raises constitutional issues outside the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the substance of the petition relates to employment and recruitment, matters which are expressly reserved for the Employment and Labour Relations Court under Article 162(2) of the Constitution. Article 165(5)(b) specifically excludes the High Court from exercising jurisdiction over such matters. Consequently, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the petition, and the matter must be placed before the appropriate specialized court. The court directed the Deputy Registrar to forward the file to the Employment and Labour Relations Court in Nairobi for urgent consideration. Costs for the transfer are to be borne by the petitioners.

Court Disposition

Preliminary objection upheld; High Court lacks jurisdiction; file to be transferred to Employment and Labour Relations Court.

Orders

  • Deputy Registrar to send the file to the Employment and Labour Relations Court in Nairobi under certificate of urgency.
  • Costs of transfer to be borne by the petitioners.