[2019] KEHC 10676 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 10676 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had not satisfied the requirements for the grant of an interim injunction as established in Giella v Cassman Brown Limited. Specifically, the claimant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case with a probability of success, and the balance of convenience favored vacating the interim...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 10676 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Wilfred Nyabuto Rianga; Respondent: County Public Service Board, Kisii County; Respondent: County Secretary, Kisii County
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 21 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Interim Injunction Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Interim Injunctions, Employment Termination, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Dismissal Interim Injunctions Employment Termination Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilfred Nyabuto Rianga

Claimant

County Public Service Board, Kisii County

Respondent

County Secretary, Kisii County

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Interim Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether the claimant satisfied the requirements for grant of an interim injunction to stop operationalization of the dismissal letter.
  2. 2 Whether a prima facie case with probability of success was established by the claimant.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience favored maintaining or vacating the interim orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had not satisfied the requirements for the grant of an interim injunction as established in Giella v Cassman Brown Limited. Specifically, the claimant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case with a probability of success, and the balance of convenience favored vacating the interim order. The court noted that by the time the application was filed, the claimant had already been dismissed from employment, making the request for interim relief untenable. The merits of the substantive case would be determined at the full hearing.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 18th January 2018 is dismissed.
  • The matter to proceed to full hearing on the merits.