[2006] KEHC 3430 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant had served a substantive part of his sentence, including 18 months in custody during the pendency of the case, which the trial court did not consider. The appellant's remorse and youthfulness were also taken into account. Despite a previous conviction, the court was satisfied that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 3430 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: William Akolo Otieno; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 74 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal against sentence allowed; sentence reduced to period already served.
- Judges
- CJ Kendagor
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Hostel Breaking, Stealing, Penal Code Section 306a, Remission of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Akolo Otieno
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant was excessive given the time already served.
- 2 Whether the trial court failed to consider the period the appellant spent in custody pending trial.
- 3 Whether the appellant's remorse and youthfulness warranted a reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant had served a substantive part of his sentence, including 18 months in custody during the pendency of the case, which the trial court did not consider. The appellant's remorse and youthfulness were also taken into account. Despite a previous conviction, the court was satisfied that the sentence already served was sufficient punishment. Therefore, the appeal against sentence was allowed, and the sentence was reduced to the period already served.
Court Disposition
Appeal against sentence allowed; sentence reduced to period already served.
Orders
- The sentence is reduced to the period already served.
- The appellant shall be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Criminal Appeal 74 of 2005
(From original conviction (s) and Sentence(s) in Criminal case No. 18421 of 2003 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Makadara (Mrs. Mbugua– R.M.)
WILLIAM AKOLO OTIENO…………..…….....................................…………………..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………….....................................………………………..…....RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
WILLIAM AKOLO OTIENO pleads with this court to find that the 18 months imprisonment he has served out of the possible 2 years exclusive of remission was sufficient punishment for the offence. The Appellant submitted that since he had served a substantial part of his sentence he was abandoning his appeal against conviction. The Appellant submitted that he had learnt his lesson and that he was remorseful for what he did.
The Appellant was convicted of Hostel Breaking and Stealing contrary to Section 306(a) of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to 3 years imprisonment. He has six months to go to complete his sentence.
Counsel for the State Mrs. Gakobo submitted that the sentence was legal and not excessive. Counsel cautioned that the Appellant was not a first offender. The Appellant on his part admitted he had committed a similar offence at the same place within a short time from the instant one.
I have considered the Appellant’s appeal against sentence. The Appellant does appear remorseful for the offence and pleads for mercy. Considering he has served a substantive part of the sentence, considering also that he was in prison custody for 18 months during the pendency of the case in the lower court a matter that the trial court did not consider, considering also that he is a young person, the one previous conviction not withstanding, I am fully satisfied that the Appellant has served sufficient sentence for the offence.
Consequently I will allow his appeal against sentence by ordering that the sentence is reduced to the period already served. The Appellant should be set free unless he is otherwise lawfully held.
Dated at Nairobi this 12th day of July 2006.
………………
LESIIT, J.
JUDGE
Read, signed and delivered in the presence of;
Appellant(s) – present
Mrs. Gakobo - State Counsel for Respondent
Tabitha – Court clerk.
…………….
LESIIT, J.
JUDGE