[2016] KEHC 8458 (KLR)
The court found that the trial magistrate's failure to pass sentence on counts 1 and 2 after convicting the applicant was both an irregularity and an illegality. Exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Sections 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court determined it was necessary to impose...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 8458 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: William Arianda Andere; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 445 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentencing Omission
- Outcome
- Sentences imposed for counts 1 and 2; fines or imprisonment in default; sentences to run consecutively.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Irregularity, Revisionary Jurisdiction, Making Document Without Authority, Uttering False Document, Obtaining by False Pretences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Arianda Andere
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentencing Omission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the omission by the trial magistrate to pass sentence on counts 1 and 2 constituted an irregularity or illegality requiring correction.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for counts 1 (making a document without authority) and 2 (uttering a false document) under the Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial magistrate's failure to pass sentence on counts 1 and 2 after convicting the applicant was both an irregularity and an illegality. Exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Sections 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court determined it was necessary to impose appropriate sentences for those counts. Considering the magistrate had imposed fines for counts 3 to 5, the High Court deemed it fair and consistent to impose similar sentences for counts 1 and 2. Accordingly, the applicant was ordered to pay a fine of KES 200,000 for count 1 (making a document without authority) or serve 1 year imprisonment in default, and a fine of KES 50,000...
Court Disposition
Sentences imposed for counts 1 and 2; fines or imprisonment in default; sentences to run consecutively.
Orders
- Applicant to pay a fine of KES 200,000 for count 1 or serve 1 year imprisonment in default.
- Applicant to pay a fine of KES 50,000 for count 2 or serve 6 months imprisonment in default.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 445 OF 2016
WILLIAM ARIANDA ANDERE………………....…………….APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
RULING
The trial court file was forwarded to this court pursuant to Section 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code with a request to revise the judgment in Kibera Criminal Case No. 2375 of 2011 in which the Applicant was the accused. He was charged with five counts as follows:
Count I: Making a document without authority contrary to Section 357(a) of the Penal Code.
Count 2: Uttering a false document contrary to Section 353 of the Penal Code.
Counts 3, 4 & 5: obtaining money by false pretences contrary to Section 313 of the Penal Code.
The learned trial magistrate, Hon. E. Juma, SPM, convicted the Applicant on all the five counts. She however only passed sentence in respect of counts 3 to 5 thereby omitting to pass sentence in counts I and II. The request to this court therefore is to pass sentence in counts I and II.
This court under its supervisory jurisdiction over the courts subordinate to it under Section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code is conferred with powers to correct any irregularity or illegality committed by a subordinate court. It is clear from the face of the judgment that the omission to pass the sentence in counts 1 and II represented not only an irregularity but an illegality as well. I am quick to add that the trial magistrate noted the omission and on her own volition forwarded the trial court file to this court for necessary action.
The particulars of count 1 were that on 3rd June, 2011 at unknown place within Ongata Rongai Township in Kajiado County, with others not before court with intent to defraud without lawful authority or excuse made title deed number KJD/OLCHORO-ONYORE/1156 purporting it to be genuine title deed issued by the land registers Kajiado. Particulars of Count II were that on the 3rd day of June, 2011 at Ongata Rongai Township in Kajiado County, knowingly and fraudulently uttered a forged Title Deed No. LR NO. KJD/OLCHORO-ONYORE/1156 to Martha Karwirwa Anthony.
Under the Penal Code, with respect to Count 1, the Applicant is liable to imprisonment for 7 years whereas in Count 2, he is liable to imprisonment for 3 years. The learned magistrate having preferred fines in Counts 3 to 5 is only fair that this court imposes a similar sentence. Accordingly, in count I, the Applicant shall pay a fine of Kshs. 200,000/= in default, serve 1 year imprisonment. In count II, he shall pay a fine of Kshs. 50,000/= in default, serve six months imprisonment. All the sentences shall consecutively. It is so ordered.
DATED and DELIVERED this 6th day of November, 2016
G.W. NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE