[2010] KEHC 3137 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success, which is the primary consideration for granting bail pending appeal. The court also found no exceptional or unusual circumstances that would justify granting bail. The assertion that the appellant would not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3137 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: William Chumba; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 77 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Unnatural Offences, Standards for Bail, Presumption of Innocence, Exceptional Circumstances
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Chumba
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be granted bail pending the hearing of his criminal appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success to justify bail.
- 3 Whether exceptional or unusual circumstances exist to warrant bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success, which is the primary consideration for granting bail pending appeal. The court also found no exceptional or unusual circumstances that would justify granting bail. The assertion that the appellant would not abscond and the support of sureties were deemed insufficient grounds for release. The court relied on established legal principles and precedent, particularly the DOMINIC KARANJA case, to conclude that the application lacked merit. Consequently, the application for bail pending appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET
Criminal Appeal 77 of 2009
WILLIAM CHUMBA:………………….……APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC:………………………............RESPONDENT
RULING
WILLIAM CHUMBAapplies under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code that pending the hearing of his appeal he be released on bail. His application is based on the grounds that he has appealed against sentence and that fairness requires that he be admitted to bail and further that this court do jealously protect the applicant’s constitutional right to liberty. He adds that his appeal has overwhelming chances of appeal and he is ready to abide by any terms and conditions set by the court for his release on bail and he will not jump bail if released. One Jimmy Kemboi described as the putative father of the Applicant has sworn the affidavit in support of the application and states that the Applicant is ready to abide with reasonable terms set by the court and that he was out on bail during the hearing of the criminal charge against him.
The Applicant was charged in Eldoret Chief Magistrate’s Criminal case No. 5306 of 2009 with the offence of committing an unnatural offence contrary to section 161 (e) of the Penal Code and was at the conclusion of the trial found guilty and convicted to serve five (5) years in jail. I have thoroughly perused the proceedings and judgment in the Chief Magistrate’s case and I do not come to the conclusion that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success (not a high probability of success as stated, this is a criminal not a civil case). The issue of constitutional liberty does not arise in this case as the Appellant is serving a lawful sentence, having lost the constitutional presumption of innocence upon conviction. Additionally the conditions to be met for one to be admitted to bail pending appeal are now well settled and there is a multitude of authorities on the subject. Suffice to quote only one such case here: - DOMINIC KARANJA –VS- REPUBLIC NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.14 OF 1986where the court of appeal quoting the case of SOMO V REPUBLIC (1972) E.A.476 re-emphasized that the most important issue for consideration is that if the appeal has such overwhelming chances of success, there is no justification for depriving the Applicant of his liberty. The relevant but minor considerations would be whether there are exceptional or unusual circumstances. It was further held in the quoted case that the previous good character of the Applicant and the hardships, if any, facing his family were not exceptional or unusual facts. Not even does ill health per se constitute an exceptional circumstance as there are medical facilities for prisoners. A solemn assertion by an Applicant that he will not abscond if released, as is stated in the application under consideration, even where such solemn assertion is supported by sureties, is not sufficient ground for releasing a convicted person on bail pending appeal.
In the instant case learned counsel for the Republic Mr. Chirchir did not think that the appeal stands a chance of succeeding. That is the same finding this court comes to. For those reasons the application under consideration is found to be without merit and is accordingly dismissed.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010
P.M.MWILU
JUDGE
IN THE PRESENCE OF:-
Paul Ekitela - Court Clerk
N/A for the Advocate for the Applicant
Kabaka holding brief for Mr. Chirchir for the state