[2013] KEHC 777 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 777 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff was the duly appointed administrator of the estate of Iropu Ichodo and that the High Court had confirmed the grant vesting the suit property in him. The registration of Siphora Amusugut Ebu as proprietor was not supported by any disclosed legal basis, and she was not an heir of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 777 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: William Emasajaa Etyang; Defendant: Siphora Amusugut Ebu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 10 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's case allowed. Registration of defendant revoked. Plaintiff to proceed with transmission. Costs to plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Land Registration, Succession and Transmission, Unlawful Registration, Revocation of Title
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Registration Succession and Transmission Unlawful Registration Revocation of Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Emasajaa Etyang

Plaintiff

Siphora Amusugut Ebu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the registration of Siphora Amusugut Ebu as proprietor of North Teso/Kamuriai/762 on 5th November, 2012 was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the registration of Siphora Amusugut Ebu should be cancelled and the plaintiff registered as proprietor by transmission upon the death of Iropu Ichodo.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was the duly appointed administrator of the estate of Iropu Ichodo and that the High Court had confirmed the grant vesting the suit property in him. The registration of Siphora Amusugut Ebu as proprietor was not supported by any disclosed legal basis, and she was not an heir of the deceased. The plaintiff had complied with all legal requirements for transmission of the property. Therefore, the registration of the defendant was unlawful and should be revoked to allow the plaintiff to be registered as proprietor by transmission. The court ordered the revocation of the defendant's registration and allowed the plaintiff to present his transmission documents...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's case allowed. Registration of defendant revoked. Plaintiff to proceed with transmission. Costs to plaintiff.

Orders

  • The registration of Siphora Amusugut Ebu on 5th November, 2012 as proprietor of North Teso/Kamuriai/762 is revoked and ownership reverts to Iropu Ichodo.
  • The plaintiff is at liberty to present his transmission documents to the Land Registrar for processing.