[2015] KEELRC 476 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 476 (KLR)

The court found that the memorandum of appeal was filed on 15th September 2011, whereas the proceedings were ready for collection on 3rd June 2011, giving the appellant until 30th July 2011 to file the appeal. Since the appeal was filed after the expiry of the statutory period and no leave of court was sought or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 476 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: William Gichamba Kinyanjui; Respondent: David Ngugi Ng’ang’a; Respondent: Arthur Njiriri Kimunya; Respondent: Rahab Mumbi Kairu (Sued as the Board of KamanduraTarambana Water Trust)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1890 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Cause / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out as incompetent for being filed out of time without leave of court.
Legal Topics
Appeal Out of Time, Leave of Court, Striking Out Pleadings
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Appeal Out of Time Leave of Court Striking Out Pleadings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Gichamba Kinyanjui

Appellant

David Ngugi Ng’ang’a

Respondent

Arthur Njiriri Kimunya

Respondent

Rahab Mumbi Kairu (Sued as the Board of KamanduraTarambana Water Trust)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Cause / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed out of time without leave of court.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be struck out as incompetent under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the memorandum of appeal was filed on 15th September 2011, whereas the proceedings were ready for collection on 3rd June 2011, giving the appellant until 30th July 2011 to file the appeal. Since the appeal was filed after the expiry of the statutory period and no leave of court was sought or obtained to file out of time, the appeal was filed contrary to section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. The court therefore held that the appeal was incompetent and ordered it struck out, awarding costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as incompetent for being filed out of time without leave of court.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out as incompetent.
  • The respondent shall have costs of the application.