[2015] KEHC 4135 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 4135 (KLR)

The court found that the administrators had failed to apply for confirmation of the grant for over twelve years and had distributed the estate without lawful confirmation, contrary to the Law of Succession Act. The court was satisfied that these failures rendered the grant inoperative and justified its revocation...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 4135 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: William Kiprono Too; Respondent: Joshua Kiprop Langat; Respondent: Dickson Cheruiyot Langat
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 149 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
grant revoked; subdivisions and transfers declared null and void; land to revert to original title; further directions issued.
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Confirmation of Grant, Fraudulent Concealment, Distribution of Estate Without Confirmation
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Confirmation of Grant Fraudulent Concealment Distribution of Estate Without Confirmation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Kiprono Too

Applicant

Joshua Kiprop Langat

Respondent

Dickson Cheruiyot Langat

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether the administrators failed to apply for confirmation of grant within the prescribed period.
  3. 3 Whether the estate was distributed without a certificate of confirmation, rendering the grant inoperative.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the administrators had failed to apply for confirmation of the grant for over twelve years and had distributed the estate without lawful confirmation, contrary to the Law of Succession Act. The court was satisfied that these failures rendered the grant inoperative and justified its revocation under Section 76(d) of the Act. The court further held that any subdivision and transfer of the estate land carried out without confirmation of grant was null and void, and ordered that the land revert to its original title pending proper determination of the succession cause.

Court Disposition

grant revoked; subdivisions and transfers declared null and void; land to revert to original title; further directions issued.

Orders

  • The grant of letters of administration issued on 24th July, 2002 is revoked.
  • Any subdivision of the original land L.R.Kericho/Kapsuser/1772 is declared null and void.