[2013] KEHC 4154 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4154 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant had made all reasonable efforts to trace and serve the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd defendants, as evidenced by the affidavit of non-service and supporting submissions. In the absence of successful personal service and with no opposition from the defendants, the court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4154 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: William Koipitat Mayon (Suing as the Legal Representative of the estate of Nkiroine Ene Mayon Ntetuka (Deceased)); Defendant: Esther Mbinya Wambua; Defendant: Olivia Akinyi Midwa; Defendant: Catherine Kageni Japhet; Defendant: National Bank of Kenya; Defendant: District Land Registrar Kajiado
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 181 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Substituted Service
Outcome
Application for substituted service allowed. Costs to the applicant.
Judges
MM Gitumbi
Legal Topics
Substituted Service, Service of Process, Non Service Affidavit
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Substituted Service Service of Process Non Service Affidavit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Koipitat Mayon (Suing as the Legal Representative of the estate of Nkiroine Ene Mayon Ntetuka (Deceased))

Plaintiff

Esther Mbinya Wambua

Defendant

Olivia Akinyi Midwa

Defendant

Catherine Kageni Japhet

Defendant

National Bank of Kenya

Defendant

District Land Registrar Kajiado

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Substituted Service

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant leave for substituted service on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd defendants due to inability to effect personal service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant had made all reasonable efforts to trace and serve the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd defendants, as evidenced by the affidavit of non-service and supporting submissions. In the absence of successful personal service and with no opposition from the defendants, the court exercised its discretion to allow substituted service in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, ensuring that the defendants are given fair notice of the proceedings.

Court Disposition

Application for substituted service allowed. Costs to the applicant.

Orders

  • Leave is granted for substituted service on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd defendants.
  • Costs of the application are awarded to the applicant.