[2016] KEELC 1268 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 1268 (KLR)

The court adopted the consent entered into by the plaintiffs and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th defendants, which provided for the maintenance of the status quo on the suit property, specifically restraining all parties from further construction, depositing building materials, occupation, cultivation, or leasing of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 1268 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: William Nderitu Waweru; Plaintiff: Samuel Ngatia Nderitu; Defendant: Beatrice Kananu; Defendant: John Kinoti; Defendant: John Kibuchi; Defendant: John Mwathe; Defendant: Esther Nkatha
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 135 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application; Adoption of Consent Order
Outcome
Consent adopted as order of the court; status quo to be maintained on the suit property pending hearing and determination of the application.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Status Quo Orders, Trespass, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Status Quo Orders Trespass Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Nderitu Waweru

Plaintiff

Samuel Ngatia Nderitu

Plaintiff

Beatrice Kananu

Defendant

John Kinoti

Defendant

John Kibuchi

Defendant

John Mwathe

Defendant

Esther Nkatha

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application; Adoption of Consent Order

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to an interlocutory prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the suit property pending determination of the application and main suit.
  2. 2 Whether the status quo should be maintained on the suit property pending hearing and determination of the application.
  3. 3 Whether the consent between the parties should be adopted as an order of the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the consent entered into by the plaintiffs and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th defendants, which provided for the maintenance of the status quo on the suit property, specifically restraining all parties from further construction, depositing building materials, occupation, cultivation, or leasing of the property pending the hearing and determination of the plaintiffs' application. The court found this approach appropriate to preserve the subject matter and prevent further interference or escalation of the dispute while the application is pending. The consent was read to the parties, and the relevant defendants undertook to comply. The court thus made the consent terms its...

Court Disposition

Consent adopted as order of the court; status quo to be maintained on the suit property pending hearing and determination of the application.

Orders

  • The status quo prevailing on the suit property LR. NO. TIMAU TOWNSHIP/2890/360 to be maintained; no party to continue with any further construction, deposit building material, occupy, cultivate or lease the suit property pending hearing and determination of the plaintiffs' application dated 16/8/16.
  • The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th defendants granted 14 days to file and serve their replying affidavit; plaintiffs granted leave to file and serve supplementary affidavit within 14 days thereafter.