[2022] KEBPRT 19 (KLR)
The tribunal found that the landlord had served a valid notice to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, and the tenant failed to file any reference or opposition. As a result, the notice took effect from 1st June 2019, entitling the landlord to an eviction order. The tribunal also found that the landlord's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEBPRT 19 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: William Njoroge Kubai; Respondent: Hamilton Ayiera Nyaga
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 587 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- Landlord's application allowed in part; eviction and partial rent arrears granted.
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Tenancy, Rent Arrears, Eviction Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Njoroge Kubai
Applicant
Hamilton Ayiera Nyaga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord is entitled to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent.
- 2 Whether the landlord is entitled to recover rent arrears from the tenant.
- 3 Whether the landlord is entitled to an order of eviction against the tenant.
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the landlord had served a valid notice to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, and the tenant failed to file any reference or opposition. As a result, the notice took effect from 1st June 2019, entitling the landlord to an eviction order. The tribunal also found that the landlord's claim for rent arrears was only substantiated in respect of one kiosk at the rate of Kshs 400 per month from 2013 to January 2022, totaling Kshs 38,800. The tribunal declined to award the higher amount claimed due to lack of evidence regarding the number of kiosks or any claim relating to rooms already vacated. The landlord was awarded costs of the reference.
Court Disposition
Landlord's application allowed in part; eviction and partial rent arrears granted.
Orders
- The tenant shall pay Kshs 38,800 to the landlord as rent arrears.
- The tenant shall be evicted from plot No. 101 Korogocho.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
39 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
VIEW PARK TOWERS 7TH & 8TH FLOOR
TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 587 OF 2019 (NAIROBI)
WILLIAM NJOROGE KUBAI................................................LANDLORD/APPLICANT
VERSUS
HAMILTON AYIERA NYAGA.................................................TENANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This matter came up for hearing on 13th January 2022. The Landlord and his advocate were present, the Tenant who had been served with a hearing notice for the day did not attend court and therefore this matter proceeded in his absence.
2. The Landlord’s case:
The Landlord sought to and was allowed to rely on his statement filed in court and dated 4th January 2022. I summarize the same as follows;
a. That he is the registered owner of plot No. 101 Korogocho which is the subject matter of this suit.
b. That he has put up houses and kiosks on the said plot and has rented them out to Tenants.
c. That the kiosks are built on the Landlord’s land contrary to the report by one Mr Karanja, the Ward Administrator.
d. That the Respondent has been the Applicant’s Tenant since 2004 when he first rented three rooms in the main building but which rooms he has since vacated.
e. That in the year 2004, the Tenant rented the Landlord’s kiosks at an agreed rent of Kshs 400/- (four hundred only).
f. That the Tenant is in rent arrears of the kiosks since the year 2013.
g. That the total rent arrears is Kshs 163,400/- and the Landlord has an order from the Tribunal allowing him to levy distress.
3. The Landlord’s complaint to the Tribunal is the one dated 19th June 2019, it states;
“Termination of the tenancy pursuant to final orders of the Tribunal having been issued against Hamilton Ayera Nyaga, in that he has refused and/or ignored to vacate dispite a notice to terminate tenancy effective 1st June 2019 being duly served.”
4. The Landlord’s notice to terminate tenancy is the one dated 10th March 2019. The ground for termination of the tenancy against the Tenant is stated as failure to pay rent for “the last 77 months amounting to Kshs 142,000/-.
The notice to terminate tenancy was served upon the Tenant and an affidavit of service filed by one Edward Mwendwa Kathunzu. The Tenant has not filed any reference against the said notice.
5. The Tenant having not filed any reference to the Tribunal in opposition to the notice to terminate his tenancy, the notice took effect from the effective date indicated thereon, that is 1st June 2019, and therefore the Landlord is entitled to the orders of eviction against the Tenant.
6. I have gone through the statement of the Landlord and I am unable to find the basis for the claim of rent arrears of Kshs 163,400/-.
7. It is not clear from the evidence of the Landlord how many kiosks the Tenant had rented. It is also not clear whether the Landlord is claiming any rent from the Tenant on account of the three rooms the Tenant has already vacated. It is doubtful whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to make any orders as regards these rooms as the Tenant is no longer a Tenant in the said rooms.
8. The Landlord has stated that the Tenant has not paid rent for the kiosks since 2013. The disclosed rent per month is Kshs 400/-. Since it is not disclosed how many kiosks the Tenant occupy, I will base the calculations of rent payable on one kiosk. This would work out as follows;
Rate Kshs 400 per month.
Duration 2013 to 2021 (8 years).
400 x 12 x 8
38,400/-.
9. I therefore do find that the rent outstanding is Kshs 38,400/- as at December 2021 and Kshs 400/- for the month of January 2022, total Kshs 38,800/- which I order the Tenant to pay to the Landlord. in view of the fact that the Landlord’s notice to terminate tenancy took effect from 1st June 2019, I do order that the Tenant be evicted from plot No. 101 Korogocho.
10. The Landlord will have the costs of this reference.
HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Ruling dated, signed and delivered virtually by Hon Cyprian Mugambi Nguthari (Chairman) this8thday of March, 2022in the presence of Mr King’oriholding brief for Mr Kimanifor theLandlord/Applicantand in the absence of the Respondent.
HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL