[2019] KEHC 2695 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2695 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was not a first offender, having previously been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for a similar offence. The applicant committed the present offence shortly after release from prison, indicating a lack of reformation. The court held that the sentence of two years...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2695 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: William Okoth Owino; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 58 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Stock Theft, Recidivism, Penal Code Section 278
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Stock Theft Recidivism Penal Code Section 278

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Okoth Owino

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant for the offence of stealing stock was excessive or warranted revision.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's personal circumstances justify a non-custodial sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was not a first offender, having previously been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for a similar offence. The applicant committed the present offence shortly after release from prison, indicating a lack of reformation. The court held that the sentence of two years imprisonment was lawful and, if anything, lenient given the maximum penalty for the offence. The applicant's personal circumstances, including family and financial obligations, did not outweigh the seriousness of the offence and his recidivist conduct. The application for revision of sentence was therefore dismissed as unmerited.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision of sentence is dismissed.
  • File closed.