[2012] KEELRC 216 (KLR)

[2012] KEELRC 216 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's delay of 15 years in seeking to file a claim for terminal benefits was inordinate and unexplained. Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, requires that claims based on employment contracts be filed within three years. The applicant failed to provide a plausible explanation for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEELRC 216 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: William Tonangweya; Respondent: Sarova Hotels Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 712 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Claim Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Terminal Benefits, Summary Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation of Actions Terminal Benefits Summary Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Tonangweya

Applicant

Sarova Hotels Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Claim Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file a claim for terminal employment benefits out of time.
  2. 2 Whether there is a plausible explanation for the 15-year delay in filing the claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's delay of 15 years in seeking to file a claim for terminal benefits was inordinate and unexplained. Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, requires that claims based on employment contracts be filed within three years. The applicant failed to provide a plausible explanation for the delay, and the court declined to exercise its discretion to grant leave to file the claim out of time. The application was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to file claim out of time is declined.
  • No further orders.