[2002] KECA 75 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 75 (KLR)

The court found that the application for extension of time was brought promptly and was not opposed by the respondent. In such circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought, allowing the applicant additional time to file and serve the notice of appeal and the record of appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 75 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Wilson Mangaa Mangaa; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 10 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application allowed.
Legal Topics
Appeal Procedure, Extension of Time
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeal Procedure Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilson Mangaa Mangaa

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve the notice of appeal and record of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for extension of time was brought promptly and was not opposed by the respondent. In such circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought, allowing the applicant additional time to file and serve the notice of appeal and the record of appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The notice of appeal must be filed and served within seven days of the date hereof.
  • The record of appeal must be lodged and served within fourteen days from the date the notice of appeal is lodged.