[2020] KEELC 678 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 678 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff had established a prima facie case by producing a Title Deed issued in his name, which, under Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, is prima facie evidence of ownership. The Defendant failed to provide documentary evidence linking itself or its predecessor to the suit...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 678 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Wilson Morris Wambua; Respondent: Waswa Investment Co. Ltd
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 1(A) of 2020
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction granted.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Title Registration, Prima Facie Case, Irreparable Injury, Balance of Convenience
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Temporary Injunctions Title Registration Prima Facie Case Irreparable Injury Balance of Convenience

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilson Morris Wambua

Applicant

Waswa Investment Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success to warrant the grant of a temporary injunction.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience tilts in favour of granting the injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff had established a prima facie case by producing a Title Deed issued in his name, which, under Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, is prima facie evidence of ownership. The Defendant failed to provide documentary evidence linking itself or its predecessor to the suit property or to show that the Plaintiff's title was acquired fraudulently or illegally. The Plaintiff was also in possession of the property, and denial of the injunction would likely cause him irreparable harm not compensable by damages. The balance of convenience favored maintaining the status quo by restraining the Defendant from interfering with the property pending the hearing and...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction granted.

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the Defendant, its agents or any person acting under it from entering, interfering and/or dealing in any manner whatsoever with the land known as Mavoko Town Block 3/60346 pending the hearing and determination of this suit.
  • The Defendant to pay the costs of the Application.