[2018] KEELRC 1234 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1234 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's suit was filed on 23 July 2013, more than three years after the cause of action arose on 4 January 2009. Section 90 of the Employment Act requires that such claims be filed within three years. As the suit was filed outside this statutory period, it was statute barred. The absence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1234 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Wilson Munywoki; Respondent: Kenya National Trading Corporation Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1162 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
suit dismissed as statute barred
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Employment Injury Claims, Statutory Bar, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation of Actions Employment Injury Claims Statutory Bar Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilson Munywoki

Claimant

Kenya National Trading Corporation Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's suit is statute barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the claim was filed within the prescribed limitation period for employment-related claims.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's suit was filed on 23 July 2013, more than three years after the cause of action arose on 4 January 2009. Section 90 of the Employment Act requires that such claims be filed within three years. As the suit was filed outside this statutory period, it was statute barred. The absence of opposition from the claimant further supported the respondent's preliminary objection. Accordingly, the court dismissed the suit for being time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed as statute barred

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for being statute barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.
  • No order as to costs.