[2019] KEELRC 2220 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2220 (KLR)

The court found that although the respondent disputed the amount claimed, it admitted and subsequently paid a substantial sum after the suit was filed. The claimant was therefore the successful party, having been compelled to file suit to recover the admitted sum. The court exercised its discretion under Section...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2220 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Wilson Nyaigoti Bichanga; Respondent: Kisii University
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 292 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim for costs allowed; costs awarded to claimant based on admitted sum.
Judges
DO Ogal, MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Part Time Employment, Remuneration Disputes, Costs Award, Contractual Entitlements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Part Time Employment Remuneration Disputes Costs Award Contractual Entitlements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilson Nyaigoti Bichanga

Claimant

Kisii University

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was entitled to the claimed sum for services rendered as a part-time lecturer.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was in default of payment and if so, to what extent.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to costs after the respondent paid the admitted sum post-filing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the respondent disputed the amount claimed, it admitted and subsequently paid a substantial sum after the suit was filed. The claimant was therefore the successful party, having been compelled to file suit to recover the admitted sum. The court exercised its discretion under Section 12(4) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act to award costs to the claimant, reasoning that the respondent's failure to pay the admitted sum prior to litigation justified compensating the claimant for the expenses incurred in prosecuting the suit. The costs are to be based on the admitted sum of Kshs.632,440, to be agreed upon or taxed.

Court Disposition

Claim for costs allowed; costs awarded to claimant based on admitted sum.

Orders

  • The claimant is awarded the costs of the suit based on the admitted sum of Kshs.632,440, to be agreed upon by the parties or taxed.