[2020] KEELC 359 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 359 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time. The reasons advanced—loss of contact with advocates, inability to pay legal fees, and closure of courts—were rejected as invalid and not constituting excusable delay. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 359 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Windrick Oparanya Wamukoya; Respondent: Bonventure Oundo Mbanda
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E4 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Res Judicata, Delay in Filing, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Appeals From Subordinate Courts Res Judicata Delay in Filing Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Windrick Oparanya Wamukoya

Applicant

Bonventure Oundo Mbanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was excusable under the circumstances.
  3. 3 Whether the intended appeal has any chances of success given the plea of res judicata.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time. The reasons advanced—loss of contact with advocates, inability to pay legal fees, and closure of courts—were rejected as invalid and not constituting excusable delay. The court further held that the lower court proceedings were not necessary at the point of filing the appeal, and that the intended appeal had no chances of success as the matter was res judicata, having already been determined in a previous suit involving the same parties and subject matter. Consequently, the application for extension of time was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for leave to file appeal out of time is dismissed with costs to the respondent.