[2005] KEHC 1460 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant is a protected tenant under the Landlord & Tenant (Shops, Hotels & Catering Establishments) Act (Cap 301) and cannot be evicted without a lawful order from the Business Premises Tribunal or a court with the requisite jurisdiction. The plaintiff's allegations of rent arrears and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 1460 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Winfred Muthoni Karuiki; Defendant: George Nga’nga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 248 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
- Outcome
- Application for injunction granted.
- Legal Topics
- Landlord Tenant Disputes, Business Premises Protection, Eviction Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Winfred Muthoni Karuiki
Plaintiff
George Nga’nga
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant, as a protected tenant under Cap 301, can be evicted without an order from the Business Premises Tribunal or a court of competent jurisdiction.
- 2 Whether an injunction should issue to restrain the plaintiff from evicting the defendant pending the hearing of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant is a protected tenant under the Landlord & Tenant (Shops, Hotels & Catering Establishments) Act (Cap 301) and cannot be evicted without a lawful order from the Business Premises Tribunal or a court with the requisite jurisdiction. The plaintiff's allegations of rent arrears and subletting, even if true, do not entitle her to evict the defendant without following due process. The defendant demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success, and the threat of eviction warranted the grant of an injunction to preserve the status quo pending the hearing of the suit.
Court Disposition
Application for injunction granted.
Orders
- An injunction is issued restraining the plaintiff from evicting the defendant from the suit premises pending the hearing of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
8 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Suit 248 of 2003 WINFRED MUTHONI KARUIKI…………………………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS GEORGE NGA’NGA……………………………………..DEFENDANT RULING
The parties agreed that l should deal only with the application of 29/6/2004 in which the Defendant sought an order to restrain the Plaintiff from evicting him from the suit premises pending the hearing of the suit.
Mr. Wachira submitted that the Defendant was a monthly tenant protected under the provisions of the Landlord & Tenant (Shop Hotels & Catering Establishments) Cap 301 (The Act) and as such the Defendant could not be evicted in the absence of an order of the Business Premises Tribunal.
In her replying Affidavit of the 15/12/2004 the Plaintiff deponed that the Defendant was in arrears with paying his rent and not consistent in paying the same. Additionally it is alleged that the Defendant has sublet the premises to C.G Retread co. This may well be so; however, it does not entitle the Plaintiff to evict the defendant from the suit premises in absence of a lawful order of either the Business Premises tribunal or a Court of law seized of the requisite jurisdiction.
The Plaintiff has his remedies but in view of the threat which is deponed to in paragraph 6 of the supporting affidavit it is only right that an injunction should issue to prevent the Defendant from wrongful eviction from the suit premises. The defendant has shown a prima facie case with a probability of success.
In the result l grant the application as prayed.
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI on the 26th January 2005
P.J RANSLEY JUDGE