[2023] KEBPRT 1314 (KLR)

[2023] KEBPRT 1314 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the landlord had lawfully issued a termination notice to the sub-tenant in the prescribed form and on valid grounds, as required by Section 4(2) of Cap 301. The sub-tenant did not file any reference or objection to the notice, and the statutory period for contesting the notice had lapsed....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 1314 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Witeithie Farmers Limited; Respondent: Domm Studios Limited
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E301 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Eviction and Costs Following Unopposed Termination Notice
Outcome
Application allowed; eviction and costs awarded to landlord.
Judges
CN Mugambi
Legal Topics
Termination of Tenancy, Eviction Proceedings, Sub Tenancy Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Termination of Tenancy Eviction Proceedings Sub Tenancy Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Witeithie Farmers Limited

Applicant

Domm Studios Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Eviction and Costs Following Unopposed Termination Notice

  1. 1 Whether the termination notice issued to the sub-tenant was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the sub-tenant's continued occupation after expiry of the notice is illegal.
  3. 3 Whether the sub-tenant should be evicted from the premises.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the landlord had lawfully issued a termination notice to the sub-tenant in the prescribed form and on valid grounds, as required by Section 4(2) of Cap 301. The sub-tenant did not file any reference or objection to the notice, and the statutory period for contesting the notice had lapsed. Consequently, the sub-tenant's continued occupation of the premises was deemed illegal. The Tribunal held that the landlord was entitled to possession of the premises and granted an order for eviction, with the assistance of the police if necessary. Costs were also awarded to the landlord. The decision was based on the clear statutory framework governing controlled tenancies and...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; eviction and costs awarded to landlord.

Orders

  • The tenant is ordered to vacate the suit premises by 30th September 2023.
  • If the tenant fails to vacate by the deadline, the landlord is at liberty to evict the tenant with the assistance of OCS Thika police station.