[2013] KEHC 856 (KLR)
The court held that the appellant's release from prison does not result in the abatement of his appeal, as provided under Section 360 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the appellant had been served with a hearing notice. Therefore, the court found it necessary to fix a fresh...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 856 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Wycliffe Oniango Khaemba; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 32 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Hearing Notice and Fixing of Hearing Date
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders issued; appeal not abated.
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Procedure, Service of Notice, Abatement of Appeal
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wycliffe Oniango Khaemba
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Hearing Notice and Fixing of Hearing Date
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the release of the appellant from prison custody abate the criminal appeal?
- 2 Was the appellant properly served with a hearing notice for his appeal?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the appellant's release from prison does not result in the abatement of his appeal, as provided under Section 360 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the appellant had been served with a hearing notice. Therefore, the court found it necessary to fix a fresh hearing date and ensure that the appellant is properly served with a hearing notice to safeguard his right to be heard on appeal.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders issued; appeal not abated.
Orders
- The Deputy Registrar will fix a fresh date for hearing of the appeal.
- The Deputy Registrar will issue a hearing notice to be served on the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 32 OF 2011
WYCLIFFE ONIANGO KHAEMBA ……………. APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………………………………… RESPONDENT
RULING
Though learned Prosecuting Counsel Ms Opiyo has informed the court that the file be closed because the appellant was released from prison on 21/11/2012, such release from prison custody does not result in abatement of his appeal. See Section 360 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 75).
There is no evidence on record that the appellant was served with a notice for hearing of his appeal. From the information in the charge sheet, he comes from Emusutswi village, Bunyore Location, Vihiga District.
I therefore order as follows –
The Deputy Registrar will fix a fresh date for hearing of the appeal.
The Deputy Registrar will issue a hearing notice to be served on the appellant.
Dated and delivered at Kakamega this 22nd day of November, 2013
George Dulu
JUDGE