[2014] KEHC 1847 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff provided adequate explanation for failing to file the declaratory suit within the statutory three-month period, specifically citing the time required to complete investigations into the alleged breach of the insurance policy. The court held that justice would be served by granting...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 1847 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Xplico Insurance Company; Defendant: Simon Mkalla Ndegwa; Defendant: Salim Khalif Ahmed; Defendant: Benson Lubando Luvi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 319 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Leave to File Out of Time, Declaratory Suit, Insurance Policy Avoidance, Statutory Time Limits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Xplico Insurance Company
Plaintiff
Simon Mkalla Ndegwa
Defendant
Salim Khalif Ahmed
Defendant
Benson Lubando Luvi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to file a declaratory suit out of time under Section 10(4) of the Insurance (Motor Vehicle Third Party Risks) Act, Cap 405.
- 2 Whether proceedings in Mombasa CMCC No. 674 of 2014 should be stayed pending the determination of the intended declaratory suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff provided adequate explanation for failing to file the declaratory suit within the statutory three-month period, specifically citing the time required to complete investigations into the alleged breach of the insurance policy. The court held that justice would be served by granting leave to file the suit out of time, as the insurer should have an opportunity to seek a declaration on its liability. The court also determined that a stay of proceedings in Mombasa CMCC No. 674 of 2014 was appropriate to prevent prejudice and conflicting outcomes, but made the stay conditional upon the plaintiff filing the intended declaratory suit within fourteen days.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Leave is granted to the plaintiff to file a declaratory suit against the respondents within fourteen days from the date of the judgment.
- Stay of proceedings in Mombasa CMCC No. 674 of 2014 is granted pending the hearing and determination of the intended declaratory suit, with the stay to be automatically lifted if the declaratory suit is not filed within fourteen days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CIVIL SUIT NO. 319 OF 2014
XPLICO INSURANCE COMPANY …..…......................................…...PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
SIMON MKALLA NDEGWA ………........................................ 1ST DEFENDANT
SALIM KHALIF AHMED …..…….............................……….. 2ND DEFENDANT
BENSON LUBANDO LUVI ……....……….………………… 3RD DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff XPLICO INSURANCE COMPANY by its ex parte Originating Summons seek the following orders-
That this Honourable Court do grant leave to the Applicant/Plaintiff to file a declaratory suit against the Respondents out of time.
That all the proceedings in Civil Suit No. Mombasa CMCC No. 674 of 2014 and any other suit arising from the road traffic accident of 18th day of October 2013 involving motor cycle Tuk Tuk Registration No. KTWA 648R be stayed pending the hearing and determination of the intended declaratory suit.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is the Insurer of Tuk Tuk Registration No. KTWA 648R (hereinafter referred to as Tuk Tuk). The Insurance cover was from 24th September 2013 upto 23rd September 2014. The insured is the second Defendant herein. That the said Tuk Tuk has a sitting capacity of three persons. It was also a provision of the Insurance Policy that the Insured or any other person with his permission could only ride the Tuk Tuk in compliance with the Licensing Laws of Kenya.
The 1st Defendant herein sued the 2nd Defendant in Mbsa CMCC No. 674 of 2014, as the registered owner of the Tuk Tuk, and the 3rd Defendant as the rider of the Tuk Tuk for an accident that occurred on 18th October 2013 whereby he was injured. The Plaintiff, as the Insurance Company has instructed a firm of Advocates to defend that suit.
An investigation, carried out by Shield Wise Loss Assessors which was completed on 21st August 2014 and which concluded that the 2nd Defendant had breached the Insurance Policy in allowing the 3rd Defendant to ride the Tuk Tuk without a valid licence and in allowing the 1st Defendant to ride seated at the front driver’s seat of the Tuk Tuk.
THE PRAYERS SOUGHT IN THE ORIGINATING SUMMONS
The Plaintiff herein in the affidavit in support to the Originating Summons and in the further affidavit of Vivianne Onyino of 7th October 2014 stated that it is desirous of filing a declaratory suit but now that the three months period provided under the Insurance (Motor Vehicle Third Party Risks) Act Cap 405 have lapsed it sought leave to file that suit out time.
Section 10 of Cap 405 provides that the Insurer has a duty to satisfy a judgment against the person insured. That obligation however is removed from an Insurer who obtains declaration that he can avoid the Policy of Insurance. Section 10(4) of Cap 405 provides-
“S.10(4) No sum shall be payable by an insurer under the foregoing provisions of this Section if in an action commenced before, or within three months after, the commencement of the proceedings in which the judgment was given, he has obtained a declaration that, apart from any provision contained in the policy he is entitled to avoid it on the ground that it was obtained by the non-disclosure of a material fact, or by a representation of fact which was false in some material particular, or, if he has avoided the policy on that ground, that he was entitled so to do apart from any provision contained in it.”
The Plaintiff has given adequate explanation, in my view, why it did not file the declaratory suit within the period provided under Section 10(4). It is for that reason that I find the order sought is deserving.
I grant the following orders-
Leave is hereby granted to the Plaintiff to file a declaratory suit against the Respondents within fourteen (14) days from this date hereof.
Stay of Mombasa CMCC No. 674 of 2014 is hereby granted pending the hearing and determination of the intended declaratory suit. For the avoidance of doubt such stay shall automatically be lifted/ vacated if the Plaintiff shall not file the intended declaratory suit within fourteen (14) days from today’s date.
Costs of this suit shall abide with the outcome of the intended declaratory suit.
DATED and DELIVERED at MOMBASA this 6TH day of NOVEMBER, 2014.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE