[2015] KEELC 248 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 248 (KLR)

The court found that Mr. Yatich Chepkonga, who purported to swear the verifying affidavit and supporting affidavit on behalf of the plaintiffs, was already deceased at the time of filing the suit. As a deceased person cannot swear an affidavit or bring an action, the affidavits were declared a nullity. Furthermore,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELC 248 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Yatich Chepkonga & 13 Other Members of Kamgoin Village; Defendant: Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer, Board of Trustees, Baringo Technical College
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 166 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Motion to Strike Out Plaint
Outcome
suit struck out as a nullity with costs to the defendant
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Capacity to Sue, Affidavit Validity, Striking Out Pleadings, Ownership of Land
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Capacity to Sue Affidavit Validity Striking Out Pleadings Ownership of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yatich Chepkonga & 13 Other Members of Kamgoin Village

Plaintiff

Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer, Board of Trustees, Baringo Technical College

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Motion to Strike Out Plaint

  1. 1 Whether a suit can be validly instituted and supported by affidavits sworn by a deceased person.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs had capacity to bring the suit given that some were deceased at the time of filing.
  3. 3 Whether the plaint and supporting affidavits are a nullity and should be struck out.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Mr. Yatich Chepkonga, who purported to swear the verifying affidavit and supporting affidavit on behalf of the plaintiffs, was already deceased at the time of filing the suit. As a deceased person cannot swear an affidavit or bring an action, the affidavits were declared a nullity. Furthermore, most of the plaintiffs were also found to be deceased, rendering the suit incompetent. The court held that the entire suit was a nullity bordering on fraud, as it was supported by affidavits of a deceased person and purportedly brought on behalf of deceased plaintiffs. Consequently, the suit was struck out with costs to the defendant.

Court Disposition

suit struck out as a nullity with costs to the defendant

Orders

  • The verifying affidavit to the plaint is declared a nullity.
  • The suit is struck out with costs to the defendant.