[2022] KEELC 15014 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 15014 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants are the registered owners of the suit properties and that their ownership was not disputed by any respondent. The Land Registration Act protects the rights of registered proprietors, entitling them to exclusive possession and occupation. The ground reports confirmed that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 15014 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Juliet Yiare (Suing as the Administratrix of The Estate of Moses Leseni Ole Yiare - Deceased); Applicant: Moses Mooke Loontasati Ololouaya; Respondent: Land Registrar, Kilgoris; Respondent: Ole Nasiti; Respondent: Land Surveyor, Kilgoris; Respondent: Joseph Kimoro; Respondent: Land Adjudication Officer, Kilgoris; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kilgoris
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application partly allowed; orders granted for eviction and injunction; no order as to costs.
Judges
EM Washe
Legal Topics
Boundary Disputes, Land Ownership, Injunctions, Eviction of Squatters
Source Language
en
Land and Property Boundary Disputes Land Ownership Injunctions Eviction of Squatters

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Juliet Yiare (Suing as the Administratrix of The Estate of Moses Leseni Ole Yiare - Deceased)

Applicant

Moses Mooke Loontasati Ololouaya

Applicant

Land Registrar, Kilgoris

Respondent

Ole Nasiti

Respondent

Land Surveyor, Kilgoris

Respondent

Joseph Kimoro

Respondent

Land Adjudication Officer, Kilgoris

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to restoration and protection of boundaries for LR No Transmara/Kimintet “D”/1077 and LR No Transmara/Kimintet “D”/1078.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to exclusive possession and occupation of the suit properties.
  3. 3 Whether the court should issue an injunction restraining the 4th and 5th respondents from trespassing or interfering with the suit properties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants are the registered owners of the suit properties and that their ownership was not disputed by any respondent. The Land Registration Act protects the rights of registered proprietors, entitling them to exclusive possession and occupation. The ground reports confirmed that boundaries were properly identified and marked, and the 4th and 5th respondents admitted to being squatters and agreed to vacate. The court held that the applicants are entitled to orders for eviction of the squatters and a permanent injunction restraining further interference. The prayer to discharge or set aside orders from another court was denied as it was not properly before the...

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed; orders granted for eviction and injunction; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The 4th and 5th respondents and their agents are directed to vacate and yield possession of any portion of land in their occupation within LR No Transmara/Kimintet “D”/1077 and LR No Transmara/Kimintet “D”/1078 within 30 days.
  • A permanent injunction is issued restraining the 4th and 5th respondents from accessing, trespassing, entering, occupying, building, cutting trees, grazing cattle, or otherwise interfering with the applicants' quiet occupation and possession of the properties.