[2022] KEHC 12838 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, having been convicted on his own plea of guilty for assault causing actual bodily harm and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, was suffering from mental illness and hallucinations, as evidenced by the presentence and sentence review reports. The court doubted whether the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 12838 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Collins Odera Yongo Alias Colly; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E039 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Sentence Review Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for sentence review allowed; applicant released from prison for psychiatric assessment and treatment.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Mental Health in Criminal Law, Sentence Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Collins Odera Yongo Alias Colly
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Sentence Review Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's sentence should be reviewed in light of his mental health condition.
- 2 Whether the applicant had the necessary mental capacity to plead to the charge of assault causing actual bodily harm.
- 3 Whether continued imprisonment is appropriate for a convict with mental illness.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, having been convicted on his own plea of guilty for assault causing actual bodily harm and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, was suffering from mental illness and hallucinations, as evidenced by the presentence and sentence review reports. The court doubted whether the applicant had the necessary mental capacity to plead to the charge and determined that continued imprisonment was inappropriate for someone with his mental health condition. The court emphasized that prisons are not suitable for the mentally ill and that it is the responsibility of the family to facilitate appropriate medical treatment. Consequently, the applicant was ordered to be...
Court Disposition
Application for sentence review allowed; applicant released from prison for psychiatric assessment and treatment.
Orders
- The applicant shall be released forthwith from prison and handed over to his father for psychiatric assessment and treatment at Siaya County Referral Hospital.
- The applicant shall remain under the care and monitoring of his father and close family members at all times.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Yongo v Republic (Criminal Revision E039 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 12838 (KLR) (8 August 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 12838 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Criminal Revision E039 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
August 8, 2022
Between
Collins Odera Yongo Alias Colly
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an Application seeking sentence review, arising from conviction and sentence in Bondo PM Magistrates’ Court Criminal Case No. 1677/2021 by Hon. J.P. Nandi, Principal Magistrate on 6/4/2022)
Ruling
1. The convict is COY is aged 30 years old. He was convicted on his own plea of guilty for the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to section 251 of the Penal Code and sentenced to serve 12 months imprisonment after mitigation and a presentence report showing that he was unsuitable for non-custodial sentence. He has now served 5 months in prison.
2. I have considered the sentence review report. The convict is said to be unsuitable for non-custodial sentence. Of great concern is that right from the presentence report filed on March 7, 2022, the convict is alleged to be suffering from some form of mental illness and hallucinations. He does not associate with other inmates and neither is he concerned about life around him. That he has in the past been taken to a psychiatrist but declined. He comes from a family that is educated and they all seem to be responsible and concerned about his mental health but that they are all unwilling to take him back home. They request that the court does take him for mental treatment and that they are willing to pay for his treatment.
3. Jails are not for the sick and especially persons with mental health issues. That is why fellow inmates are said to laugh at the convict so he isolates himself from them because they call him mad.
4. Having considered the sentence review report, I am doubtful as to whether the convict had the necessary mental capacity to plead to the charge.
5. Nonetheless, it is the duty of his family members to make disclosures of the convict’s mental state so that he can be assisted to be committed to a medical facility for treatment and not a prison where he cannot be rehabilitated from as nobody understands his condition.
6. For the above reasons, I order that the convict COY shall be released forthwith from prison and handed over to his father HYO who shall take him to the Siaya County Referral Psychiatrist for mental assessment and appropriate treatment recommended.
7. The convict shall at all times be under the care of and monitoring by his father HYO and the close family members. He is accordingly discharged from prison forthwith, and the probation officer, Bondo, to facilitate his discharge and release to his father.
8. Orders accordingly.
9. File closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022RE ABURILIJUDGE