[2019] KEELC 4154 (KLR)
The court found that the application was res judicata as the issues raised had already been determined in a previous ruling dated 11th November 2016, where the court stayed the suit and directed the parties to pursue their claims in Kerugoya Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 300 of 2013. The parties and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 4154 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Zablon Kimindu Mutonyi; Defendant: Joseph Muchiri Kiburi; Defendant: Jeremiah Muciri Maliah; Respondent: Njoka Ngethi; Respondent: Stephen Mbogo Muthoni
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 26 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Injunction and Joinder
- Outcome
- application dismissed as res judicata; costs to respondents
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Temporary Injunctions, Joinder of Parties, Stay of Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zablon Kimindu Mutonyi
Plaintiff
Joseph Muchiri Kiburi
Defendant
Jeremiah Muciri Maliah
Defendant
Njoka Ngethi
Respondent
Stephen Mbogo Muthoni
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Injunction and Joinder
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application is res judicata due to prior determination of similar issues.
- 2 Whether the interested parties should be joined to the suit.
- 3 Whether a temporary injunction should issue restraining the interested parties from dealing with the suit land parcels.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application was res judicata as the issues raised had already been determined in a previous ruling dated 11th November 2016, where the court stayed the suit and directed the parties to pursue their claims in Kerugoya Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 300 of 2013. The parties and subject matter were the same, and the orders previously issued remained in force, having neither been set aside nor appealed. The court held that the applicant was attempting to relitigate matters already conclusively determined, constituting an abuse of process. Consequently, the application for temporary injunction, joinder of interested parties, and amendment of the plaint was...
Court Disposition
application dismissed as res judicata; costs to respondents
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 6th March 2018 is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KERUGOYA
ELC CASE NO. 26 OF 2015
ZABLON KIMINDU MUTONYI.....................................................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOSEPH MUCHIRI KIBURI.................................................................................1ST DEFENDANT
JEREMIAH MUCIRI MALIAH...........................................................................2ND DEFENDANT
AND
NJOKA NGETHI...................................INTENDED 1ST INTERESTED PARTY/RESPONDENT
STEPHEN MBOGO MUTHONI.........INTENDED 2ND INTERESTED PARTY/RESPONDENT
RULING
[1] This application is brought under Order 3A CPA and Order I Rule 1, 5 and 6 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
The applicant prays for a temporary injunction restraining the alleged interested parties herein by themselves, their agents, invitees, workmen and /or servants from alienating, selling and/or charging land parcels No. Kabare/Kiritine/2621 and 2622 or otherwise maintaining status quo. He also prays that the interested parties be made parties to this suit and that leave be granted to amend the plaint filed herein.
[2] The respondents filed grounds of objection and stated that the issue raised herein is res-judicata in that there was a similar application dated 21st January 2016 that was heard and determined by the Court on 11th November 2016 whereby this suit was stayed and all its proceedings. Finally, it is argued that this application is an abuse of the process of the Court. The respondents pray for its dismissal with costs.
[3] I have perused the Court’s ruling dated 11th November 2016 and I have noted that the parties were the same. The defendants had sought to strike the plaintiff’s suit herein with costs. The prayers sought in the defendants’ application were the same. The application sought for a temporary injunction to be issued restraining the defendants by themselves, their agents, invitees, workmen and/or servants from alienating, selling and/or interfering with land parcels No. Kabare/Kiritine/2621 and 2622 pending the hearing of that application.
The Court noted that the parties were litigating in Kerugoya Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 300 of 2013. The Judge ruled that the parties were caught up with Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and that the same lands Kabare/Kiritine/2621 and 2622 were only registered in the names of Njoka Ngethi and Stephen Mbogo Muthoni who are not parties to this suit.
The Court stayed the suit and advised the parties to pursue their respective claims in Kerugoya Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 300 of 2013.
These orders are still in force and have not been set aside and/or appealed from. The issues being raised herein by the applicant have been exhaustively determined by this Court. They have not been stayed and/or set aside.
The Notice of Motion dated 6th March 2018 is dismissed since it raises issues that have already been dealt with by this Court. The costs shall be to the respondents.
DATED and SIGNED at Kerugoya in open Court this 22nd day of March, 2019.
E.C. CHERONO
ELC JUDGE
22ND MARCH, 2019
In the presence of:
1. Mr. Kagio for Respondent – present
2. Mr. Mwai holding brief for Mr. Omenya for Applicant