[2021] KEHC 1698 (KLR)
The court found that while the Supreme Court decision in Francis Muruatetu allows for resentencing in murder cases, the petitioner failed to demonstrate how his current life sentence was unconstitutional. The court considered the gravity of the offence, noting that the petitioner was convicted of murdering two...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 1698 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Zacharia Bokongo Ogutu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 8 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- life sentence set aside; petitioner resentenced to thirty years imprisonment for each count, sentences to run concurrently from 4th October 2012.
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Unconstitutionality of Death Penalty, Murder Conviction, Sentencing Guidelines
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zacharia Bokongo Ogutu
Petitioner
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner's sentence of life imprisonment is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Francis Muruatetu.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing considering the period spent in custody and his rehabilitation.
- 3 What is the appropriate sentence for the petitioner convicted of murder of two persons.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the Supreme Court decision in Francis Muruatetu allows for resentencing in murder cases, the petitioner failed to demonstrate how his current life sentence was unconstitutional. The court considered the gravity of the offence, noting that the petitioner was convicted of murdering two persons, his wife and her son, who died painful deaths. The court also considered the period of 11 years already spent in custody and the petitioner's claims of rehabilitation. However, the court held that a non-custodial sentence was not appropriate given the seriousness of the crime. Consequently, the court set aside the life sentence and resentenced the petitioner to thirty years...
Court Disposition
life sentence set aside; petitioner resentenced to thirty years imprisonment for each count, sentences to run concurrently from 4th October 2012.
Orders
- The life sentence is set aside.
- The petitioner is sentenced to thirty (30) years imprisonment for each count, sentences to run concurrently from 4th October 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISII
CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NUMBER 8 OF 2020
(FROM ORIGINAL HIGH COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO. 119 OF 2010 KISII HIGH COURT)
ZACHARIA BOKONGO OGUTU......................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..........................................................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. In a petition filed on the 21st May 2020 the petitioner seeks a re –sentencing. He claims that he was convicted of murder and was sentenced to death which was later on commuted to life imprisonment by the president.
2. He claims that his sentence was unconstitutional and in considering his resentence application the court should consider the period he spent in custody since his arrest to date.
3. He avers that he has been rehabilitated reformed trained and a law abiding citizen. He has been in prison for more than 11 years. That he has attained certificates. He pleads for mercy and leniency
4. The petitioner further urges the court to be guided by the ruling of the Supreme Court of Kenya in the case of Francis Muruatetu which held that the death sentence was unconstitutional. He submitted that the court should be guided by the sentencing guidelines in considering his petition for resentencing.
5. Mr. Otieno for the state urged the court to note that the petitioner was convicted of killing 2 people and that the court should give him an appropriate sentence.
6. I have read the judgment in murder case no 119 of 2010. The petitioner was convicted of the murder of 2 persons his wife and her son. The accused committed the murder and took off from his home leaving the 2 deceased’s persons in their house. The petitioner was sentenced to death and later his sentence was commuted to life as per his submissions. The petitioner has failed to show how his current sentence is unconstitutional.
7. The Supreme Court in clarifying its decision in the Francis Muruatetu case stated that resentencing applies to murder case only.
8. The petitioner states that he has been in custody and jail for a total of 11 years. He was convicted of murdering 2 people. The deceased persons died a painful death. 2 innocent lives were lost. Though I did not seek a pre- sentence report in my view the petitioner does not deserve a non-custodial sentence. I have considered the period of 11 years and I resentence the petitioner as follows; the life sentence is set aside and the petitioner is sentenced to thirty (30) years imprisonment from the date of sentence by the trial court, the 4th of October 2012 for each count. The sentences to run concurrently.
Right of appeal explained.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at KISII this 16th day of November 2021.
R. E. OUGO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Petitioner Zacharia Bokongo Ogutu
Mr. Kaino State Counsel ODDP
Ms Rael Court Assistant