[2013] KEHC 4347 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant is the registered proprietor of the suit property, as evidenced by the official search. The respondent, having failed to file a replying affidavit or appear in court, did not demonstrate any legally cognizable interest in the property that would justify the caution. The only stated...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4347 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Zakaria Nyamweya Nyamwega; Respondent: Sophia Bonareri Gesicho
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application 302 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application to Remove Caution
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Caution, Registered Proprietorship, Beneficial Interest, Land Title Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zakaria Nyamweya Nyamwega
Applicant
Sophia Bonareri Gesicho
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application to Remove Caution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent had a legally cognizable interest justifying the caution registered against the applicant's land title.
- 2 Whether the applicant, as registered proprietor, is entitled to removal of the caution in the absence of opposition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant is the registered proprietor of the suit property, as evidenced by the official search. The respondent, having failed to file a replying affidavit or appear in court, did not demonstrate any legally cognizable interest in the property that would justify the caution. The only stated basis for the caution was a 'beneficiary interest,' which was neither explained nor substantiated. Under Section 131 of the Registered Land Act (now repealed), only persons with a legitimate claim to an interest in the land may lodge a caution. In the absence of any evidence or argument from the respondent, the court concluded that the caution was improperly lodged and should...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The District Land Registrar Kisii/Gucha District is directed to remove forthwith the caution registered against land parcel number Wanjare Bogiakumu/4606 on 21st March, 2012.
- The applicant shall have the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court of Kisii
Civil Miscellaneous Application 302 of 2012 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]
ZAKARIA NYAMWEYA NYAMWEGA…………………………..APPLICANT
VERSUS
SOPHIA BONARERI GESICHO………………………..………RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The application before me has been brought by way of Notice of Motion dated 5th December, 2012. The same is supported by the Affidavit of the Applicant sworn on the same date. The application is not opposed. The applicant who filed the application in person has filed in court an affidavit of service of the hearing notice upon the respondent sworn by a court process server by the name Justus Orondo. I am satisfied that the respondent was served with the application herein and a hearing notice to the effect that the same was coming up for hearing on 20th February, 2013. The respondent having chosen not to appear in court, I heard the applicant in her absence.
2. In his address to the court, the applicant asked the court to remove the caution that was lodged by the respondent against the title of the property known as Wanjare Bogiakumu/4606 (hereinafter referred to only as “the suit property”) on 21st March, 2012. The applicant relied entirely on his affidavit in support of the application and prayed for the application to be allowed. I have considered the application and the affidavit sworn on 5th December, 2012 in support of thereof. I am satisfied that the applicant is the registered proprietor of the suit property.
3. The applicant has annexed to the affidavit in support of the application a copy of official search dated 22nd November, 2012 which shows that he is the proprietor of the suit property. The search shows that the applicant was registered as the proprietor of the suit property on 15th August, 2011. The said certificate of search shows further that on 21st March, 2012, a caution was registered against the title of the suit property in favour of the respondent. A copy of the said caution was not produced in court but from the search a foresaid, it is indicated that the respondent lodged the caution to protect what is referred to as “beneficiary’s interest”. This caution was registered under Section 131 of the Registered land Act Cap. 300 Laws of Kenya (now repealed). That section is very clear as to who can register a caution against title to land. A caution can only be lodged by a person, who claims a right to obtain an interest in land, lease or charge which is capable of creation by an instrument registrable under the said repealed Act or a person who is entitled to a license over the land or a person who has presented a bankruptcy petition against a proprietor of land, lease or charge. For the respondent to be ableto maintain the caution registered against the title of the suit property, the respondent has to show that she has an interest in the nature set out above.
4. As I have already stated above, the respondent is claiming “beneficiary interest”. In the absence of a replying affidavit, I am unable to understand what beneficial interest the respondent has on the applicant’s property. I am also unable to determine whether such interest was capable of being created by an instrument registrable under the Registered land Act, Cap. 300 Laws of Kenya (now repealed). The applicant has demonstrated that he is the registered proprietor of the suit property and that, the respondent has no right to lodge a caution against her title. In the absence of any justification from the respondent as to why the caution should not be removed, the applicant’s application must succeed. I therefore allow the application dated 5th December, 2012 and direct the District land Registrar Kisii/Gucha District to
HC.MISC.APPL.NO.302 OF 2012
NO.37
remove forthwith the caution that was registered against land parcel number Wanjare Bogiakumu/4606on 21st March, 2012. The applicant shall have the costs of the application.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kisii this 8th day of March, 2013.
S. OKONG’O,
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
No appearance Applicant.
No appearance Respondent.
Mobisa Court Clerk.
S. OKONG’O,
JUDGE.
HC.MISC.APPL.NO.302 OF 2012
[if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; line-height:115%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif";} </style> <![endif]