[2014] KEELRC 1474 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant was entitled to payment for acting as branch secretary during the substantive holder's leave, as there was sufficient evidence of actual performance of those duties and clear arrangements between the parties, despite the absence of a formal acting appointment. The court held that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEELRC 1474 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Zakary Mwangi Muriu; Respondent: Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers; Respondent: Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers (Nanyuki Branch)
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 23 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partially allowed.
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Acting Appointment, Sitting Allowances, Entitlement to Salary, Union Officials Remuneration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zakary Mwangi Muriu
Claimant
Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers
Respondent
Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers (Nanyuki Branch)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for acting as branch secretary during the substantive holder's leave period.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to half salary for the period of suspension as a part-time official.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to recover Kshs. 53,000.00 allegedly due under private arrangements with a third party.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant was entitled to payment for acting as branch secretary during the substantive holder's leave, as there was sufficient evidence of actual performance of those duties and clear arrangements between the parties, despite the absence of a formal acting appointment. The court held that the respondents' internal deficiencies in making a formal appointment could not be used to deny the claimant his entitlement. However, the claims for half salary during suspension and for Kshs. 53,000.00 based on private arrangements with a third party failed, as the claimant did not establish a legal basis for those claims. The claimant was awarded Kshs. 45,000.00 for acting...
Court Disposition
Claim partially allowed.
Orders
- The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 70,000.00 by 1.02.2015, failing which interest at court rates shall accrue from 04.02.2014 until full payment.
- The claimant is awarded costs of the suit fixed at Kshs. 25,000.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
CAUSE NO.23 OF 2014
ZAKARY MWANGI MURIU.........................................................................................................................CLAIMANT
-VERSUS-
KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS...................................... 1ST RESPONDENT
KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS (NANYUKI BRANCH)............................ 2ST RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday 19th December, 2014)
JUDGMENT
The claimant filed the suit against the respondents on 04. 02. 2014 acting in person. The claimant prayed for judgment against the respondent for Kshs. 188,000. 00; interest; costs; and any other relief the honourable court may deem fit.
The respondents’ memorandum of defence was filed on 26. 03. 2014. The respondents prayed that the claimant’s suit be dismissed with costs.
By the court order of 19. 09. 2014 the dispute was referred for conciliation before the labour officer at Laikipia County. The conciliator’s report was filed in court on 19. 09. 2014. The conciliator found as follows:
The claimant was a part-time respondents’ union official who under the respondent’s constitution was entitled to sitting allowances for meetings attended and not salaries.
Moses Mureithi Waiganjo the branch secretary went on a three months’ accumulated leave from 2nd June 2011 to 5th October 2011. During that period, the respondents did not appoint the claimant to act in place of the branch secretary who was on leave.
As relates to Kshs. 53,000. 00 with respect to the payments to Josphat Nyaga Njoka, the said Njoka had been paid by the Advocates who handled the case and the claimant could not recover the same from the respondents because the claimant’s claims were based on private arrangements between the claimant and the said Njoka.
The claimant was dissatisfied with the findings and recommendations by the conciliator and the case went to full hearing before this court. The only issue for determination is whether the claimant is entitled to the remedies as prayed for. The court makes findings as follows:
There is sufficient evidence that the claimant served to discharge duties of the branch secretary when Moses Mureithi Waiganjo was on leave for three months in August, September, and October 2011. The respondent’s evidence was that there was no acting appointment but the court finds that there were clear arrangements between the parties that the claimant performs such duties and the respondents’ internal deficiencies to make and convey the formal acting appointment cannot be visited upon the claimant. There is no dispute that the branch secretary was entitled to a monthly pay as a full time employee and the court finds that the claimant is entitled to the Kshs. 45, 000. 00 as the reasonable pay in that regard and as prayed for.
The claimant prayed for Kshs. 90,000. 00 being half salary for the period of suspension as a part-time official for the respondents at the branch level. The court finds that it is not in dispute that as a part-time official the claimant could only earn sitting allowances for meetings attended and the claimant has not established the basis of the prayer. The same shall therefore fail.
The claimant prayed for Kshs. 53,000. 00 being the amount of money received by the respondents as judgment sum in favour of one Josphat Nyaga Njoka and allegedly due to the claimant under alleged private arrangements between the said Njoka and the claimant. The court finds that the claimant failed to establish the basis of the claim and the same shall fail.
The claimant has partially succeeded in his claim and is awarded costs of the suit fixed at Kshs. 25,000. 00.
In conclusion judgment is entered for the claimant against the respondent for the respondent to pay the claimant Kshs.70, 000. 00 by 1. 02. 2015 failing interest at court rates to be payable from the date of the suit 04. 02. 2014 till full payment.
Signed, datedanddeliveredin court atNyerithisFriday, 19th December, 2014.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE