[2020] KEELC 3963 (KLR)
The court found that the application for stay of execution was filed more than two months after the impugned ruling, with no evidence that an appeal was filed within the statutory period. Additionally, the applicant did not offer any deposit as security, which is a mandatory prerequisite for an order of stay of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 3963 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Zakayo Kamenchu; Respondent: Jennifer Kanario Ikiao; Respondent: Douglas Kinyua Ikamati
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case ? of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution denied; application certified urgent; remaining prayers to be canvassed at later date.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeals, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zakayo Kamenchu
Applicant
Jennifer Kanario Ikiao
Respondent
Douglas Kinyua Ikamati
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the ruling delivered on 27th May, 2020 pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the application was filed within the statutory time for appeal.
- 3 Whether the applicant has provided security as a prerequisite for stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for stay of execution was filed more than two months after the impugned ruling, with no evidence that an appeal was filed within the statutory period. Additionally, the applicant did not offer any deposit as security, which is a mandatory prerequisite for an order of stay of execution. Consequently, the court denied the prayer for stay of execution but certified the application as urgent and directed that the remaining prayers be canvassed at a later date.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution denied; application certified urgent; remaining prayers to be canvassed at later date.
Orders
- This application is certified urgent.
- Prayer for stay of execution is denied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA MERU
ELC MISC APPLICATION CASE NO. 15 OF 2020
ZAKAYO KAMENCHU.............................................. APPLICANT
VERSUS
JENNIFER KANARIO IKIAO ........................1ST RESPONDENT
DOUGLAS KINYUA IKAMATI .................... 2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This application is dated 5th August, 2020and seeks the following orders:
1. That this matter be certified urgent and heard on a priority basis.
2. That this honourable court do allow the hearing of this application during the vacation due to the urgency involved and for justices end.
3. That pending hearing and determination of this application interparties, the honourable court be pleased to grant an order of (sic) stay of execution in the Ruling delivered by the Honourable Court on 27th May, 2020 by the Honourable Gathogo Sogomo in Tigania PMCC No. 17 of 2020.
4. That pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal this honourable court be pleased to order of (sic) stay of execution in the Ruling delivered by the honourable Court on 27th May,2020 by the Honourable Gathogo Sogomo in Tigania PMCC No. 17 of 2020.
5. That the Memorandum of Appeal annexed hereto be deemed as duly filed.
6. That costs of this application be in the cause.
2. The application is supported by the affidavit of Zakayo Kamenchu, the applicant and has six grounds:-
1. That in a Ruling delivered in the Principal Magistrates Court on 27th May, 2020 a determination against the applicant was made.
2. That the intended appeal is arguable and has overwhelming chances of success.
3. That this application has been made diligently and without unreasonable delay.
4. That the applicant is ready to abide with the conditions set by court.
5. That unless the said ruling is stayed the applicant will suffer irreparably.
6. That accordingly, in the interests of justice and fairness, the said orders sought in this application ought to be granted as prayed.
3. Having perused the application, I note that the impugned ruling was delivered on 27th May, 2020 over two months before this application was filed. There is no evidence that an appeal was filed within the statutorily stipulated time. The applicant has also not offered any deposit as security which deposit is a mandatory prerequisite for an order of stay of execution to accrue.
4. In the circumstances,
a) This application is certified urgent.
b) Prayer 3 is denied.
c) Prayers 4, 5 and 6 will be canvassed at the Meru ELC Court on 19th August, 2020.
Delivered in chamber at Chuka this 12th day of August, 2020 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
P. M NJOROGE,
JUDGE.