[2021] KEHC 772 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 772 (KLR)

Since oral arguments on the jurisdictional issue were already taken before Hon. Lady Justice F. Amin, the matter is considered part-heard. It is therefore appropriate and in accordance with judicial practice that the same judge who heard the arguments should deliver the ruling. The current judge refrains from making...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 772 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Zena Makokha Mohammed; Plaintiff: Martha Atieno Onyango; Defendant: Joyce Pacilisha Shimanyula; Defendant: Thomas Shimanyula Levi; Defendant: Family Bank Limited; Defendant: Pawaba Auctioneers
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 1 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer of Matter
Outcome
Matter referred to Hon. Lady Justice F. Amin for further directions; no ruling on the merits by current judge.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction Transfer, Part Heard Matters, Environment and Land Court, High Court Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Jurisdiction Transfer Part Heard Matters Environment and Land Court High Court Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zena Makokha Mohammed

Plaintiff

Martha Atieno Onyango

Plaintiff

Joyce Pacilisha Shimanyula

Defendant

Thomas Shimanyula Levi

Defendant

Family Bank Limited

Defendant

Pawaba Auctioneers

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer of Matter

  1. 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to transfer a matter pending before it to the High Court.
  2. 2 Whether it is proper for a different judge to deliver a ruling on an issue that was part-heard by another judge.

Ratio Decidendi

Since oral arguments on the jurisdictional issue were already taken before Hon. Lady Justice F. Amin, the matter is considered part-heard. It is therefore appropriate and in accordance with judicial practice that the same judge who heard the arguments should deliver the ruling. The current judge refrains from making a determination and directs that the matter be placed before Hon. Lady Justice F. Amin for further directions.

Court Disposition

Matter referred to Hon. Lady Justice F. Amin for further directions; no ruling on the merits by current judge.

Orders

  • The matter shall be placed before Hon. Lady Justice F. Amin for further directions.