[2010] KEHC 2070 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the registered owner of the suit parcels KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1304 by producing valid title deeds. The defendant, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not rebut the plaintiff's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2070 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Zephania Khisa Saul; Defendant: Moses Wafula Sahani
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 5 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof; Undefended Suit
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff; orders of eviction, permanent injunction, costs, and interest granted.
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Permanent Injunction, Trespass to Land, Ownership of Land
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zephania Khisa Saul
Plaintiff
Moses Wafula Sahani
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof; Undefended Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the registered owner of parcels KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1304.
- 2 Whether the defendant's entry and activities on the suit land constitute trespass.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order of eviction and a permanent injunction against the defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the registered owner of the suit parcels KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1304 by producing valid title deeds. The defendant, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not rebut the plaintiff's evidence. The court held that the defendant's entry onto the land and acts of ploughing and waste constituted trespass. Consequently, the plaintiff was entitled to an order of eviction and a permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his agents from further trespass. The court also awarded costs and interest at court rates to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff; orders of eviction, permanent injunction, costs, and interest granted.
Orders
- An order of eviction from parcels numbers KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1304.
- A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his agents, servants, and any other person claiming through him from trespassing onto land titles KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1305.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE Civil Suit 5 of 2005
ZEPHANIA KHISA SAUL........................................................PLAINTIFF.
VERSUS
MOSES WAFULA SAHANI..............................................DEFENDANT.
J U D G M E N T.
By a plaint dated 6th January, 2005 the plaintiff herein, ZEPHANIA KHISA SAUL, sought judgment against the defendant for:-
(a)an order of eviction.
(b)A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, whether by himself, his agents, servants and/or any other persons claiming interest and/or acting through the defendant from trespassing onto land title KIMILILI/SIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SIKHENDU/1304.
The defendant was served with summons to enter Appearance on the 23rd day of January, 2005 (as per the affidavit of John Wafula Simatwa sworn on the 8th day of March, 2005) but failed to enter appearance.
Consequently, interlocutory judgment was entered against him on 30th March, 2005. The suit was first fixed for formal proof on 28th November, 2005 and after several adjournments heard on 5th May, 2010.
The plaintiff’s cause of action is embodied on paragraphs 4 and 5 of the plaint.
The plaintiff testified that he is the registered owner of land parcels No.s KIMILILI SHIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU 1304. In proof thereof the plaintiff tendered in evidence two title deeds as Exhibits 1 and 2 respectively. It was the plaintiffs case that sometime in the year 1996 the defendant without any colour of right entered into the said parcels and commenced ploughing and committing acts of waste thereon. The plaintiff contends that the defendants acts as aforesaid Constitute trespass.
As I said earlier, the suit is undefended. I have carefully gone through the plaintiff’s pleadings and evidence in court. Having done so, I am persuaded that in the absence of evidence in rebuttal the plaintiff is the owner of the two parcels; namely; KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1303 and 1304 respectively. Accordingly, the acts of the defendants in ploughing the said parcels and committing acts of waste amount to trespass. The plaintiff has thus proved his case on a balance of probability.
Accordingly, there shall be judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant as follows:
1. An order of eviction from parcels numbers KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1304.
2. A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, whether by himself, his agents, servants and/or any other person claiming interest and/or acting through the defendant from trespassing onto land titles KIMILILI/SIKHENDU/1303 and KIMILILI/SIKHENDU/1305 however and whatsoever.
3. Costs.
4. Interest at court rates.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Kitale this 5th day of May, 2010.
N.R.O. OMBIJA.
JUDGE.