[2010] KEHC 64 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 64 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant, as a co-administrator, fraudulently registered itself as proprietor of 1.15 acres instead of the 0.3 acres allocated to it by the confirmed grant. The transfer was effected without the involvement or signature of the plaintiff, the other co-administrator, in violation of the law...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 64 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Zephania Khisa Saul; Defendant: The Board of Trustees, Kamusinde Salvation Army Church
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 4(5) of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Land Transfer, Administration of Estates, Co Administrator Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Fraudulent Land Transfer Administration of Estates Co Administrator Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zephania Khisa Saul

Plaintiff

The Board of Trustees, Kamusinde Salvation Army Church

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant fraudulently registered itself as proprietor of more land than entitled to under the confirmed grant.
  2. 2 Whether the transfer and registration of 1.15 acres to the defendant was lawful without the co-administrator's involvement.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to retransfer of the excess land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant, as a co-administrator, fraudulently registered itself as proprietor of 1.15 acres instead of the 0.3 acres allocated to it by the confirmed grant. The transfer was effected without the involvement or signature of the plaintiff, the other co-administrator, in violation of the law and the terms of the confirmed grant. Since the defendant failed to enter appearance or file a defence, the plaintiff's evidence was uncontroverted and proved to the required standard. The court held that the defendant must retransfer the excess land to the plaintiff, and if it fails to do so, the relevant land entry shall be cancelled and the Deputy Registrar authorized to...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to retransfer the portion of KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1302 apart from 0.3 acres within 30 days to the plaintiff.
  • If the defendant fails to do so, the entry on LR. No. KIMILILI/SHIKHENDU/1302 shall stand cancelled.