[2020] KEHC 739 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 739 (KLR)

The court allowed the withdrawal of the judicial review application as sought by the applicant, noting that no pleadings or responses had been filed by the respondents or interested parties. In the absence of opposition or participation by the other parties, and in exercise of its discretion, the court marked the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 739 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Zhang Aixian; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Inspector General of Police; Respondent: Directorate of Criminal Investigations; Respondent: Chief Magistrate's Court, Kibera; Respondent: Jiang Baoqui; Respondent: Silzha Limited; Respondent: Registrar of Companies; Respondent: Edward Ate Nanok
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E041 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Withdrawal Ruling
Outcome
withdrawn
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Withdrawal, Costs Orders, Case Closure
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Withdrawal Costs Orders Case Closure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zhang Aixian

Applicant

Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Inspector General of Police

Respondent

Directorate of Criminal Investigations

Respondent

Chief Magistrate's Court, Kibera

Respondent

Jiang Baoqui

Respondent

Silzha Limited

Respondent

Registrar of Companies

Respondent

Edward Ate Nanok

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Withdrawal Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's withdrawal of the judicial review application should be allowed without an order as to costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed the withdrawal of the judicial review application as sought by the applicant, noting that no pleadings or responses had been filed by the respondents or interested parties. In the absence of opposition or participation by the other parties, and in exercise of its discretion, the court marked the suit as withdrawn with no order as to costs. The case was accordingly closed, and the Deputy Registrar was directed to notify the applicant of the ruling by electronic mail.

Court Disposition

withdrawn

Orders

  • This suit is marked as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and the case is accordingly closed.
  • The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling to the ex parte Applicant by electronic mail by close of business on Thursday, 10th December 2020.