[2019] KEELC 475 (KLR)
The court found that the amendment sought was necessary to correct the names of the parties and to update the pleadings to reflect the current status of the land parcels in dispute, which had been subdivided after the suit was filed. The court noted that the information regarding the new parcel numbers was not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 475 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Zipporah Karigu Mwambi alias Karigu M’Mugambi Ngiti; Plaintiff: John Mwathi M’Mugambi; Plaintiff: Jeremiah Murauko Mugambi; Plaintiff: Beatrice Gacunku; Plaintiff: David Mutugi Karigu; Plaintiff: Josphat Njeri Kiaya; Defendant: Zavera Gakundi Mwithi; Defendant: Beatrice Kathambi; Defendant: Charity Kaindi; Defendant: Virginia Muthoni; Defendant: John Kimathi; Defendant: Alice Karimi; Defendant: James Mutugi Mwithi; Defendant: Gerald Mugambi; Defendant: James Mwenda Mwithi alias John Kimathi; Defendant: Stanley Murithi Nyamu; Defendant: Mary Wambui Mwobi
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 20 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Land Parcel Subdivision, Parties Identification, Compliance With Civil Procedure Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zipporah Karigu Mwambi alias Karigu M’Mugambi Ngiti
Plaintiff
John Mwathi M’Mugambi
Plaintiff
Jeremiah Murauko Mugambi
Plaintiff
Beatrice Gacunku
Plaintiff
David Mutugi Karigu
Plaintiff
Josphat Njeri Kiaya
Plaintiff
Zavera Gakundi Mwithi
Defendant
Beatrice Kathambi
Defendant
Charity Kaindi
Defendant
Virginia Muthoni
Defendant
John Kimathi
Defendant
Alice Karimi
Defendant
James Mutugi Mwithi
Defendant
Gerald Mugambi
Defendant
James Mwenda Mwithi alias John Kimathi
Defendant
Stanley Murithi Nyamu
Defendant
Mary Wambui Mwobi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend the plaint to correct names and reflect new land parcel numbers.
- 2 Whether the amendment is necessary for the just determination of the parties' rights and claims.
- 3 Whether the defendants would suffer prejudice if the amendment is allowed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the amendment sought was necessary to correct the names of the parties and to update the pleadings to reflect the current status of the land parcels in dispute, which had been subdivided after the suit was filed. The court noted that the information regarding the new parcel numbers was not available to the applicants at the time of filing and that the amendment would enable the court to determine the rights and claims of the parties effectively. The court further observed that the respondents did not oppose the application and that no prejudice would be suffered by allowing the amendment. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application for leave to amend the plaint is allowed with costs to be in the cause.
- The plaintiffs are directed to fully comply with Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules within 21 days of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
50 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CASE NO. 20 OF 2019
ZIPPORAH KARIGU MWAMBI
alias KARIGU M’MUGAMBI NGITI ...................................... 1ST PLAINTIFF
JOHN MWATHI M’MUGAMBI................................................2ND PLAINTIFF
JEREMIAH MURAUKO MUGAMBI......................................3RD PLAINTIFF
BEATRICE GACUNKU.............................................................4TH PLAINTIFF
DAVID MUTUGI KARIGU.......................................................5TH PLAINTIFF
JOSPHAT NJERI KIAYA...........................................................6TH PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
ZAVERA GAKUNDI MWITHI............................................. 1ST DEFENDANT
BEATRICE KATHAMBI........................................................2ND DEFENDANT
CHARITY KAINDI.................................................................3RD DEFENDANT
VIRGINIA MUTHONI............................................................4TH DEFENDANT
JOHN KIMATHI......................................................................5TH DEFENDANT
ALICE KARIMI.......................................................................6TH DEFENDANT
JAMES MUTUGI MWITHI...................................................7TH DEFENDANT
GERALD MUGAMBI..............................................................8TH DEFENDANT
JAMES MWENDA MWITHI alias JOHN KIMATHI.........9TH DEFENDANT
STANLEY MURITHI NYAMU.............................................10TH DEFENDANT
MARY WAMBUI MWOBI....................................................11TH DEFENDANT
RULING
1. This application is brought to court under Order 8 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. The application is supported by the affidavit of Zipporah Karigu Mugambi, the 1st defendant and seeks the following orders:
a) The Hon. Court be pleased to grant the applicant leave to amend her plaint as per the annexed copy.
b) The amended copy of the plaint be deemed as duly filed and duly served.
c) Costs of this application be in the cause.
2. The application has the following grounds:
i) The name of the 1st plaintiff is Zipporah Karigu Mugambi alias Karigu M’Mugambi Ngiti and not Zipporah Karigu Mwambi.
ii) The first name of the 1st defendant is spelt as Zavera and not SABERA.
iii) That land parcel No. South Tharaka/Tunyai “A”/390 has been subsided into seven new parcels including land parcel No. South Tharaka/Tunyai “A”/4586, 4587, 4588, 4590, 4591, 4592.
iv) That the information concerning the new parcel numbers was not known to the applicants at the time they filed the suit on 30th September, 2019 because they were relying on the green card issued to them on 27th August, 2019 whereas the new titles were registered on 29th August, 2019.
v) That at the time the suit was filed the land was registered in the names of the 1st and 7th Respondents/Defendants to hold in trust for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 7th Respondents/defendants.
vi) That after the subdivisions made on 29th August, 2019 three portions have been registered in the names of the 10th, 11th and 12th defendants.
vii) That information reaching the applicants indicates that the 5th defendant is the same person being the names of James Mwenda Mwithi.
viii) That it is in the interest of justice that the seven new land parcels be consolidated back to the old land parcel No. South Tharaka/Tunyai “A”/390 so that the rights and claims of the Applicants can be determined by this Hon. Court.
ix) That although new parcel numbers have been curved out of land parcel No. South Tharaka/Tunyai “A”/390 there has been no subdivision done on the ground and it hard for the applicants to know where their respective land parcels lie on the ground and we do not know which of the respondents is holding the land titles to our particular areas we are occupying.
x) The defendants will not suffer any prejudice.
3. On 25th November, 2019 the parties had intimidated that they were seeking an out of court settlement. They were to come to court on 9th December, 2019 to record a settlement. On 9th December, 2019, Mr. Kaai Mugambi, the defendants’ advocate told the court that the parties had failed to reach a consent. He asked the court to issue directions with a view to the suit being escalated to full hearing.
4. Mr. Kaai Mugambi told the court that he was not opposed to the application being allowed.
5. The following directions are issued:-
a) This application is allowed with costs to be in the cause.
b) The plaintiffs are directed to fully comply with Order 11, CPR within 21 days of today and the defendants are directed to do so within 21 days after receipt of the plaintiffs’ compliance documents.
c) Parties are to come to court to take directions on 10. 1.2020.
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 9th day of December, 2019 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Riungu h/b Kithaka for the Plaintiff
Kaai Mugambi for the Defendants
P. M. NJOROGE,
JUDGE.