[2021] KEELC 552 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 552 (KLR)

The court held that the issue of whether the plaintiff has locus standi and whether a customary trust exists are matters that require evidence and cannot be determined at the preliminary stage. The objection raised by the 2nd Defendant, premised on the lack of grant of representation and alleged procedural defects,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 552 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Zuwena Omar Somobwana; Defendant: Gaffer Omar Somobwana; Defendant: Kidogo Basi Housing Cooperative
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 137 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection overruled
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Customary Trusts, Succession Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Locus Standi Customary Trusts Succession Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zuwena Omar Somobwana

Plaintiff

Gaffer Omar Somobwana

Defendant

Kidogo Basi Housing Cooperative

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has locus standi to institute the suit on behalf of the deceased without a grant of representation.
  2. 2 Whether the suit is fatally defective for want of compliance with the Laws of Succession Act.
  3. 3 Whether the question of trust under Section 28 of the Land Registration Act is a matter for trial.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the issue of whether the plaintiff has locus standi and whether a customary trust exists are matters that require evidence and cannot be determined at the preliminary stage. The objection raised by the 2nd Defendant, premised on the lack of grant of representation and alleged procedural defects, was found to be unmerited. The court determined that the question of trust under Section 28 of the Land Registration Act is substantive and should be resolved at trial after the parties have presented their evidence. Accordingly, the preliminary objection was overruled and costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection overruled

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is overruled.
  • Costs to be in the cause.