Mango v Hatari Security Ltd (Appeal E001 of 2026)
Mango v Hatari Security Ltd (Appeal E001 of 2026) [2026] KEELRC 2198 (KLR) (30 July 2026) (Judgment)
The appeal failed because the record showed the appellant voluntarily resigned through a letter dated 7th November 2022 and executed a clearance form discharging the respondent from further claims. There was no evidentiary basis to support allegations of forgery or forced termination, and the monetary claims for overtime and off-duty days were unsupported by the pleadings and trial evidence. The trial court was therefore correct to reject compensation and notice pay, and the appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.
Source excerpt
- Unfair termination
- Resignation
- Notice pay
- Terminal benefits
- Proof of employment claims
- Appellate review