The High Court acquitted the accused after the prosecution closed its case without witnesses, finding no prima facie case and ordering release from custody.
The High Court at Iten closed the prosecution case in a murder trial after repeated failure to secure witnesses, and acquitted the accused under section 210.
The Court of Appeal held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to revise an acquittal order under Section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as the statute expressly prohibits altering or reversing an acquittal through revision. Although the trial court's acquittal of the respondent was improper—since the respondent had not appeared, had not taken plea, and the acquittal was entered on a mention date without proof of service—the appellants' recourse should have been by way of appeal, not revision. The Court further found that the appellants, particularly the 3rd appellant as private prosec…
The High Court found that the trial magistrate did not err in acquitting the Respondent under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The prosecution had failed to present any evidence, and the Respondent was not responsible for the delays or absence of witnesses. The court held that the prosecution's application for withdrawal under Section 87(a) was not made in the public interest but to circumvent the court's order to proceed. The acquittal was proper as there was no evidence to require the Respondent to make a defence. The revisionary powers of the High Court are supervisory and shoul…
The High Court held that it could not acquit the applicant on an unaddressed count in revision and remitted the file to the trial magistrate to pronounce on Count III.
Steel Partners Ltd v Chege & another [2023] KEHC 26930 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Miscellaneous Application E331 of 2023
Judge
SM Mohochi
The High Court set aside a trial court acquittal under section 210 CPC, finding it was made before any prosecution evidence had been tendered and was therefore irregular.
The High Court found that the trial magistrate should have acquitted the respondent under section 210, not section 202, of the Criminal Procedure Code, as the prosecution closed its case without adducing any evidence. The prosecution failed to provide sufficient explanation for the absence of witnesses over multiple adjournments and did not utilize available alternatives, such as calling the investigating officer. The court held that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case and that the acquittal of the respondent was justified. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, and the…
Republic v Omukanda & 4 others [2023] KEHC 21426 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Criminal Appeal 104 of 2019
Judge
WM Musyoka
The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside an acquittal under section 210 and substituting an order permitting withdrawal of the prosecution under section 87(a).
The High Court at Eldoret quashed murder proceedings and acquitted the accused after finding an inordinate, unexplained prosecution delay that violated the right to a fair trial.
Republic v Mwatha & 2 others [2023] KEHC 18937 (KLR)
Court
High Court
Case number
Criminal Appeal 5 of 2020
Judge
PM Mulwa
The High Court allowed a prosecution appeal, set aside an acquittal entered under section 210 CPC, and ordered a retrial after non-attendance by the prosecution.