Karani & 2 others v Karani & 2 others; Murage & another (Intended Defendant)
Karani & 2 others v Karani & 2 others; Murage & another (Intended Defendant) [2025] KEELC 5341 (KLR)
The court found that the doctrine of res judicata did not apply because the previous suit involved different parties and issues, specifically a buyer-seller dispute rather than a claim based on customary trust. The Applicants established locus standi as beneficiaries and long-term occupants of the land, with their claim anchored in customary trust rather than succession law. The court held that the joinder of Patrick Githinji Murage and the Land Registrar was necessary for a comprehensive adjudication, as their interests and roles were directly implicated in the dispute. Leave to amend the pl…
Source excerpt
- Customary Trust
- Joinder Of Parties
- Amendment Of Pleadings
- Temporary Injunction
- Locus Standi
- Res Judicata