Jona v Republic
Jona v Republic [2025] KEHC 10598 (KLR)
The High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review or revise the applicant's sentence because the Court of Appeal had already considered and affirmed both the conviction and the sentence, including the issue of time spent in remand custody. The trial court had expressly stated that it took into account the period spent in remand when imposing the 25-year sentence, and the Court of Appeal confirmed this finding, dismissing the applicant's argument to the contrary. As a result, the sentence became that of the Court of Appeal, and the High Court was functus officio and precluded from revi…
Source excerpt
- Sentence Revision
- Remand Custody Credit
- Jurisdiction Of High Court
- Functus Officio
- Appeal Process
- Statutory Compliance