Kala & another v Huka
Kala & another v Huka [2025] KEHC 10537 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial Magistrate erred by failing to consider the defence medical report by Dr. John Macharia, which was produced by consent and provided a materially different assessment of the injuries and permanent disability. The court determined that the trial court's omission to reference or weigh this evidence, as well as the Appellants' submissions, amounted to a denial of fairness and led to an excessive award of damages. Upon independent evaluation of the medical evidence and treatment records, the appellate court concluded that the Respondent suffered less severe inju…
Source excerpt
- Assessment Of Damages
- Personal Injury
- Medical Evidence
- Appellate Review