Duba v Republic
Duba v Republic [2025] KEHC 6546 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence was overwhelming and proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant broke into the complainant's shop and was apprehended at the scene. However, the appellant was wrongly charged with burglary and stealing under sections 304(2) and 279(b) of the Penal Code, as the premises was not a dwelling house. The court exercised its power under section 187 of the Criminal Procedure Code to substitute the conviction to breaking into a building and committing a felony under section 306(a) of the Penal Code. On sentencing, the court held that the trial mag…
Source excerpt
- Breaking Into Building
- Burglary
- Sentencing Principles
- Appeals On Conviction
- Proportionality In Sentencing