Wanja v Republic
Wanja v Republic [2024] KEHC 13561 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial court's conviction of the appellant was fundamentally flawed because it relied on a transcription of an audio recording that was not in the official language of the court and was not properly translated. The court held that such a document has no probative value and cannot form the basis of a conviction. The trial court's failure to ensure that the evidence was admissible and comprehensible in the language of the court was a fatal error. As a result, the conviction was not supported by admissible evidence, and the sentence based on that conviction could not…
Source excerpt
- Corruption Offences
- Admissibility Of Evidence
- Language Of Court
- Standard Of Proof
- Entrapment
- Criminal Appeals