Semo v Ricosam Engineering Limited
Semo v Ricosam Engineering Limited [2024] KEHC 14054 (KLR)
The court held that the applicant's grounds for challenging the arbitral award, except for the allegation of conflict with public policy, amounted to an impermissible invitation to sit on appeal over the arbitrator's factual and legal findings, contrary to Section 32A of the Arbitration Act. The only ground open for consideration was whether the award was contrary to public policy. The applicant failed to specify or prove which works were incomplete, did not provide evidence of additional expenses or independent reports, and did not refer any dispute to arbitration or terminate the contract f…
Source excerpt
- Arbitral Award Challenge
- Public Policy Exception
- Finality Of Arbitral Awards
- Construction Contracts
- Evidence In Arbitration