Kenya Case Law

Dado v Republic & 7 others

Dado v Republic & 7 others [2025] KEHC 10627 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Revision E027 of 2024

Judge

SC Chirchir

The court found that the respondents had previously been acquitted under Section 206 of the Criminal Procedure Code in criminal case number 385 of 2019 for the same offences and facts as those in criminal case number E641 of 2023. The subsequent prosecution in E641 of 2023, therefore, constituted double jeopardy and violated the respondents' rights under Article 50(2)(o) of the Constitution and Section 138 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The trial court's finding that the prosecution was barred by double jeopardy was correct in law and fact. The High Court, exercising its revisionary jurisdic…

Source excerpt

• Double Jeopardy
• Acquittal
• Forcible Entry
• Forcible Detainer

Republic v Muriuki & 3 others

Republic v Muriuki & 3 others [2025] KEHC 9374 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Revision E168 of 2023

Judge

EM Muriithi

The High Court quashed a magistrate’s acquittal entered under section 202 CPC, finding no inquiry was made into notice of the complainant’s hearing date and venue.

• Forcible Entry
• Forcible Detainer
• Acquittal For Nonattendance
• Concurrent Civil And Criminal Proceedings
• Exercise Of Discretion
• Supervisory Jurisdiction

Mohammed v Republic

Mohammed v Republic [2025] KEHC 6655 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Appeal E009 of 2025

Judge

JN Onyiego

The court held that while the applicant did not demonstrate exceptional or unusual circumstances—since having a young family and prior compliance with bail terms are not sufficient—the appeal was not hopeless, particularly given the contestation over land ownership and the civil nature of the underlying dispute. Applying the prima facie test from Jivraj Shah v Republic, the court found that the applicant met the threshold for bail pending appeal. The presumption of innocence no longer applied, but the court was satisfied that the appeal raised substantial points of law and fact. The sentence…

Source excerpt

• Bail Pending Appeal
• Forcible Detainer
• Land Disputes
• Exceptional Circumstances
• Presumption Of Innocence

Barisa v Republic

Barisa v Republic [2025] KEHC 5271 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Appeal E021 of 2024

Judge

AN Ongeri

The High Court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the offence of forcible detainer beyond reasonable doubt. There was no concrete evidence of the complainant's legal ownership or entitlement to the land, and the prosecution did not establish that the appellant was in actual possession of the land or that his actions were likely to cause a breach of the peace. The trial court erred by relying on hearsay evidence, failing to consider the appellant's defense under the Kishamba B Group Ranch Constitution and Section 8 of the Penal Code, and improperly shifting th…

Source excerpt

• Forcible Detainer
• Burden Of Proof
• Land Ownership Disputes
• Bona Fide Claim Of Right

Kirubai v Republic

Kirubai v Republic [2025] KEHC 8974 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Appeal E018 of 2023

Judge

AN Ongeri

The High Court found that while the appellant was in actual possession of the suit property, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that her possession constituted the offence of forcible detainer. The evidence showed a genuine dispute over ownership, with the appellant claiming to have purchased the property and the complainant holding a title deed. The trial court failed to adequately consider the appellant's evidence of purchase. The judge determined that the matter was essentially a civil dispute over land ownership, more appropriately resolved in the Environment and Land…

Source excerpt

• Forcible Detainer
• Burden Of Proof
• Land Ownership Disputes
• Probation Sentencing

Abdullahi v Director of Public Prosecutions & 5 others

Abdullahi v Director of Public Prosecutions & 5 others [2025] KEHC 703 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Constitutional Petition E021 of 2024

Judge

HM Nyaga

The court granted a stay of the criminal proceedings because the dispute concerning land ownership was complex and the subject matter of the criminal case appeared to be intertwined with multiple pending civil suits, raising concerns about the potential for the criminal process to be an abuse of court process and a threat to the Applicant's rights before the civil matters are resolved.

Source excerpt

• Abuse Of Process
• Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings
• Right To Fair Trial
• Forcible Detainer
• Judicial Review
• Land Ownership Disputes

Odhiambo & 2 others v Republic

Odhiambo & 2 others v Republic [2024] KEHC 16142 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Appeal E058 of 2023

Judge

DK Kemei

The court found that the appellants were in actual and constructive possession of the disputed land without any legal right, as evidenced by their actions in ploughing and denying access to the registered owner. The evidence established that their possession was likely to cause a breach of peace, satisfying the elements of forcible detainer under section 91 of the Penal Code. The court also found that the appellants uttered threats to kill, which were heard by multiple witnesses and caused the complainant to fear for his life, thus meeting the threshold for the offence under section 223(1) of…

Source excerpt

• Forcible Detainer
• Threatening To Kill
• Land Ownership Disputes
• Criminal Sentencing
• Probation Orders

Sepepiari v Republic

Sepepiari v Republic [2024] KEHC 15596 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Appeal E002 of 2023

Judge

F Gikonyo

The court found that the appellant was in actual possession of the complainant's land without any colour of right, as the title deed he relied on did not emanate from the land registry and the land it purported to represent did not exist in the relevant group ranch records. The complainant was the lawful holder of the title to the land in question. The appellant's occupation was against the interests of the legal owner and was likely to cause a breach of the peace, as evidenced by failed interventions by elders and police. The appellant's defence of bona fide claim of right was rejected due t…

Source excerpt

• Forcible Detainer
• Making Document Without Authority
• Land Title Fraud
• Possession Without Colour Of Right
• Sentencing Principles
• Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Odek v Republic

Odek v Republic [2024] KEHC 15146 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Criminal Appeal E039 of 2023

Judge

KW Kiarie

The High Court set aside ex parte orders made in a criminal case, finding the appellant was denied representation and that the magistrate acted without evidence.

• Forcible Detainer
• Fair Trial Rights
• Criminal Procedure Irregularity
• Land Possession Disputes
• Forcible-detainer
• Fair-trial-rights

Hola v Republic

Hola v Republic [2024] KEHC 14575 (KLR)

Court

High Court

Case number

Miscellaneous Criminal Application E083 of 2024

Judge

DK Kemei

The High Court at Siaya reviewed a custodial sentence imposed on a first offender convicted of trespass and forcible detainer, substituting probation for the remainder.

• Sentence Review
• Probation Orders
• Misdemeanors
• Forcible Detainer
• Trespass
• First Offender Principle