Jackson Gitonga Ibuuri v Republic
Jackson Gitonga Ibuuri v Republic [2017] KEHC 7893 (KLR)
The court found that the grounds raised by the petitioner—regarding the language of the court at plea, lack of interpretation of a witness's testimony, and alleged non-compliance with section 169 of the Criminal Procedure Code—were not new or compelling evidence as required by Article 50(6) of the Constitution. These issues were apparent at the time of trial and on appeal, and the petitioner had opportunities to raise them previously. The court further held that the alleged procedural irregularities did not result in prejudice to the petitioner, as he was represented by counsel who actively p…
Source excerpt
- New And Compelling Evidence
- Right To Fair Trial
- Interpretation Of Article 50
- Procedural Irregularities
- Compliance With Criminal Procedure Code