Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Kenya decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tort law [2026] KEMC 472 (KLR)

Hezron v Aberi

Hezron v Aberi (Civil Suit E1586 of 2026) [2026] KEMC 472 (KLR) (12 August 2026) (Judgment)

The Defendant was held 100% liable because the Plaintiff gave uncontroverted evidence that the Defendant, while in control of the vehicle, drove negligently causing it to veer off the road into a ditch, and the Defendant offered no rebuttal. On quantum, the Plaintiff’s injuries, 15% permanent incapacity, residual scarring/deformity, and need for implant removal justified Kshs.1,000,000 in general damages, Kshs.100,000 in future medical expenses, and Kshs.9,550 in special damages.

  • Negligence
  • Liability
  • Res ipsa loquitur
  • Quantum of damages
  • General damages
  • Special damages
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEMC 467 (KLR)

Mugwika v Kuria aka David Mwangi

Mugwika v Kuria aka David Mwangi (Civil Suit E6242 of 2024) [2026] KEMC 467 (KLR) (12 August 2026) (Judgment)

Because the Plaintiff’s evidence on the manner of accident and injuries was uncontroverted and supported by medical documents, the Court held the Defendant 100% liable. Considering the soft tissue injuries, residual stiffness of the left index finger, and 2% permanent incapacity, the Court found Kshs. 220,000 fair and reasonable general damages, plus strictly proved special damages of Kshs. 7,100.

  • Negligence
  • Liability
  • Damages assessment
  • Special damages
  • General damages
  • Default judgment
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEMC 380 (KLR)

Stella v Kibe & another

Stella v Kibe & another (Civil Suit E3620 of 2024) [2026] KEMC 380 (KLR) (29 July 2026) (Judgment)

The Plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that the accident occurred because the 2nd Defendant negligently drove the lorry on the wrong side of the road and hit her while she was lawfully walking on the roadside. The Defendants called no evidence, so their denial and allegation of contributory negligence remained unproven. The 1st Defendant was vicariously liable because the lorry was his vehicle and the 2nd Defendant was driving it in the absence of evidence that he acted outside the scope of employment. On quantum, the Plaintiff’s pelvic fracture healed without permanent disability…

  • Negligence
  • Liability
  • Vicarious liability
  • Res ipsa loquitur
  • Burden of proof
  • Contributory negligence
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEHC 10948 (KLR)

Taki v Maina

Taki v Maina (Civil Appeal E221 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 10948 (KLR) (16 July 2026) (Judgment)

The Respondent produced sufficient documentary evidence, including a sale agreement and police abstract, to prove that the Appellant owned and had possession of the suit motor vehicle at the material time, and the Appellant failed to rebut that evidence. The trial court’s general damages award of Kshs. 4,000,000 was within the range of comparable awards for similarly severe spinal injuries and was not an erroneous estimate warranting interference.

  • Liability
  • Proof of ownership of motor vehicle
  • Burden of proof
  • Assessment of general damages
  • Assessment of special damages
  • Appellate interference with damages
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEHC 10399 (KLR)

Ongoma v Rentco Africa Ltd

Ongoma v Rentco Africa Ltd (Civil Appeal E129 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 10399 (KLR) (8 July 2026) (Judgment)

The Appellant failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that he was a pillion passenger, and in any event failed to prove negligence or liability against the Respondent. The trial court therefore correctly dismissed the claim on liability. Although the trial court did not assess damages, the appellate court assessed them for completeness at Kshs. 80,000 in general damages and Kshs. 6,000 in special damages.

  • First appeal
  • Burden of proof
  • Liability
  • Pillion passenger status
  • Police abstract evidential value
  • Assessment of damages
Read case analysis
Civil litigation [2026] KEHC 9593 (KLR)

Isoe v Opanga & another

Isoe v Opanga & another (Civil Appeal E121 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 9593 (KLR) (2 July 2026) (Judgment)

The appellate court held that the trial court misapprehended the evidence by treating an OB name discrepancy as conclusive while ignoring corroborative evidence from the appellant, the police abstract, medical reports, and the respondent's own investigator. On a balance of probabilities, the appellant proved he was the person injured in the accident and also proved negligence against the respondent. Liability was therefore imposed at 100% against the respondent, and damages were reassessed at Kshs. 150,000 general damages plus Kshs. 7,050 special damages.

  • Proof of involvement in accident
  • Clerical error in occurrence book
  • Balance of probabilities
  • Negligence
  • Liability
  • Article 159(2)(d)
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEHC 9932 (KLR)

ROK (Suing as the Mother and Next Friend of RB (A Minor)) v Mutuku

ROK (Suing as the Mother and Next Friend of RB (A Minor)) v Mutuku (Civil Appeal E089 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 9932 (KLR) (2 July 2026) (Judgment)

The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving negligence on a balance of probabilities. The evidence did not establish the speed, manner of driving, or any objective basis to attribute fault to the respondent’s driver, and the mere fact that the matatu rolled was insufficient to prove liability. The trial court therefore correctly dismissed the suit, and the appeal failed.

  • Negligence
  • Burden of proof
  • Liability
  • Appellate review
  • Passenger injury claim
  • Proof of damages
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEMC 563 (KLR)

MOW & LAO (Suing as the Legal Representatives of the Estate of KCO -Minor - Deceased ) v Busia Ebenezer Academy Co. Ltd & another

MOW & LAO (Suing as the Legal Representatives of the Estate of KCO -Minor - Deceased ) v Busia Ebenezer Academy Co. Ltd & another (Civil Case E238 of 2025) [2026] KEMC 563 (KLR) (30 June 2026) (Judgment)

The judgment text was not provided beyond the case heading, so the court’s reasoning, findings on liability, and the final award cannot be extracted from the supplied material.

  • Estate representatives
  • Minor deceased
  • Liability
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEMC 759 (KLR)

HLK (Suing as the next friend and father of MI) v Mbuthia

HLK (Suing as the next friend and father of MI) v Mbuthia (Civil Case E185 of 2025) [2026] KEMC 759 (KLR) (30 June 2026) (Judgment)

The Plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that the Defendant’s motor vehicle hit the motorcycle from behind, creating a prima facie case of negligence which the Defendant failed to rebut because he called no evidence. The minor, being a pillion passenger, was not shown to be contributorily negligent. On quantum, the pleaded and proved soft tissue injuries attracted Kshs. 200,000 in general damages, and only Kshs. 6,550 of the pleaded special damages was strictly proved.

  • Negligence
  • Liability
  • Minor suing through next friend
  • Direct evidence
  • Hearsay evidence
  • Contributory negligence
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] KEHC 9662 (KLR)

PAO (Minor Suing through a Father and Next Friend DPO) v Odumba & 6 others

PAO (Minor Suing through a Father and Next Friend DPO) v Odumba & 6 others (Civil Appeal E198 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 9662 (KLR) (26 June 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEHC 9662 (KLR)

  • Appellate review
  • Liability
  • Damages
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.